The 2025 WTA 1000 Cincinnati Open runs from August 7–17 with a supersized 96-player field—up from 56 last year—on the fast outdoor hard courts of the Lindner Family Tennis Center. As the final major stop before the US Open, it promises a stacked lineup of the WTA Tour’s best.
Sabalenka Returned to Defend Her Crown but Fails
World No. 1 Aryna Sabalenka was back after a month-long absence, aiming to defend her Cincinnati title. She was joined by 2023 champion Coco Gauff, four-time major winner Iga Swiatek, and fellow Top 10 contenders Jessica Pegula, Amanda Anisimova, Madison Keys, and Elena Rybakina.
Anisimova was the first to bow out, falling to Anna Kalinskaya in the Round of 32. Keys was defeated by Rybakina, who then faced Sabalenka. Pegula could not get past Poland’s Magda Linette, who in turn lost to surprise package Veronika Kudermetova. Kudermetova’s quarter-final opponent turned out to be the biggest shock of the tournament — Varvara Gracheva. The Frenchwoman had put together a string of six consecutive wins to earn her place in the last eight.
Notable Absences but Surprise Entrants
Big names missing included Zheng Qinwen and Paula Badosa (injuries), as well as Montreal finalist Naomi Osaka and champion Victoria Mboko, both sidelined after deep runs in Canada. Cincinnati still delivered surprises — Venus Williams returned but fell to Spain’s in-form Jessica Bouzas Maneiro in the first round, while Caroline Garcia made her wildcard count and went on to face Karolina Muchova in the Round of 64. Muchova won but could not make it to the pre-quarters.
American Hopes Ran High
The U.S. boasted five of the top eight seeds — Gauff (No. 2), Pegula (No. 4), Anisimova (No. 5), Keys (No. 6), and Navarro (No. 8). Pegula, last year’s finalist, was eager for revenge after falling to Sabalenka in 2024. With home support and familiar courts, an American champion seemed within reach. However, by the quarterfinals, only Coco Gauff had remained. She then fell to Jasmine Paolini.
Conclusion: Swiatek Solidifies, Paolini Soars
The 2025 Cincinnati Open delivered on every front—elite matchups, breakout performances, and a final that showcased two players trending in opposite, yet equally compelling, directions. For Iga Swiatek, the title wasn’t just another addition to her growing trophy cabinet—it was a statement. Her win on one of the tour’s fastest hard courts confirmed a new chapter in her career: one where she’s no longer just dominant on clay, but dangerous everywhere. Entering the US Open as the woman to beat feels not only earned but inevitable.
For Jasmine Paolini, Cincinnati was another validation of her evolution. She didn’t just make a final—she fought tooth and nail through a stacked draw, beating Coco Gauff on American soil and pushing Swiatek to find her very best. Paolini proved she belongs among the game’s elite. Her rise continues—and New York will be watching.
Cincinnati 2025 Final Result & Stats
Iga Swiatek (Pol) defeated Jasmine Paolini (Ita) 7-5 6-4
Swiatek vs Paolini – Match Stats
Statistic | Swiatek | Paolini |
---|---|---|
Dominance Ratio | 1.18 | 0.85 |
Serve Rating | 236 | 196 |
Aces | 9 | 0 |
Double Faults | 7 | 2 |
1st Serve % | 59% (46/78) | 58% (37/64) |
1st Serve Points Won | 67% (31/46) | 65% (24/37) |
2nd Serve Points Won | 44% (14/32) | 30% (8/27) |
Break Points Saved | 60% (6/10) | 0% (0/6) |
Service Games | 64% (7/11) | 45% (5/11) |
Ace % | 11.5% | 0% |
Double Fault % | 9% | 3.1% |
Return Rating | 260 | 165 |
1st Return Points Won | 35% (13/37) | 33% (15/46) |
2nd Return Points Won | 70% (19/27) | 56% (18/32) |
Break Points Won | 100% (6/6) | 40% (4/10) |
Return Games | 55% (6/11) | 36% (4/11) |
Pressure Points | 75% (12/16) | 25% (4/16) |
Service Points | 58% (45/78) | 50% (32/64) |
Return Points | 50% (32/64) | 42% (33/78) |
Total Points | 54% (77/142) | 46% (65/142) |
Match Points Saved | 0 | 0 |
Max Points In A Row | 6 | 5 |
Service Games | 64% (7/11) | 45% (5/11) |
Return Games | 55% (6/11) | 36% (4/11) |
Total Games | 59% (13/22) | 41% (9/22) |
Max Games In A Row | 5 | 3 |
Injury Timeouts | 0 | 0 |
Match Duration | 1h 50m |
Full extended match report right here
Cincinnati 2025 Semi-Finals Results & Stats
Elena Rybakina (Kaz) – Iga Swiatek (Pol) 5-7 3-6
Rybakina vs Swiatek – Match Stats
Statistic | Rybakina | Swiatek |
---|---|---|
Dominance Ratio | 0.69 | 1.45 |
Serve Rating | 248 | 301 |
Aces | 10 | 7 |
Double Faults | 1 | 3 |
1st Serve % | 58% (38/66) | 67% (39/58) |
1st Serve Points Won | 63% (24/38) | 87% (34/39) |
2nd Serve Points Won | 48% (13/27) | 53% (10/19) |
Break Points Saved | 67% (6/9) | 75% (3/4) |
Service Games | 70% (7/10) | 90% (9/10) |
Ace % | 15.2% | 12.1% |
Double Fault % | 1.5% | 5.2% |
Return Rating | 95 | 152 |
1st Return Points Won | 13% (5/39) | 37% (14/38) |
2nd Return Points Won | 47% (9/19) | 52% (14/27) |
Break Points Won | 25% (1/4) | 33% (3/9) |
Return Games | 10% (1/10) | 30% (3/10) |
Pressure Points | 54% (7/13) | 46% (6/13) |
Service Points | 58% (38/66) | 71% (41/58) |
Return Points | 29% (17/58) | 42% (28/66) |
Total Points | 44% (55/124) | 56% (69/124) |
Match Points Saved | 2 | 0 |
Max Points In A Row | 7 | 10 |
Service Games | 70% (7/10) | 90% (9/10) |
Return Games | 10% (1/10) | 30% (3/10) |
Total Games | 40% (8/20) | 60% (12/20) |
Max Games In A Row | 3 | 5 |
Injury Timeouts | 0 | 0 |
Match Duration | 1h 35m |
Veronika Kudermetova (Wrl) – Jasmine Paolini (Ita) 3-6 7-6(7-2) 3-6
Kudermetova vs Paolini – Match Stats
Statistic | Kudermetova | Paolini |
---|---|---|
Dominance Ratio | 0.78 | 1.27 |
Serve Rating | 264 | 305 |
Aces | 10 | 2 |
Double Faults | 4 | 2 |
1st Serve % | 56% (48/86) | 71% (70/99) |
1st Serve Points Won | 81% (39/48) | 74% (52/70) |
2nd Serve Points Won | 42% (16/38) | 66% (19/29) |
Break Points Saved | 0% (0/3) | 83% (5/6) |
Service Games | 79% (11/14) | 94% (15/16) |
Ace % | 11.6% | 2% |
Double Fault % | 4.7% | 2% |
Return Rating | 83 | 198 |
1st Return Points Won | 26% (18/70) | 19% (9/48) |
2nd Return Points Won | 34% (10/29) | 58% (22/38) |
Break Points Won | 17% (1/6) | 100% (3/3) |
Return Games | 6% (1/16) | 21% (3/14) |
Pressure Points | 11% (1/9) | 89% (8/9) |
Service Points | 64% (55/86) | 72% (71/99) |
Return Points | 28% (28/99) | 36% (31/86) |
Total Points | 45% (83/185) | 55% (102/185) |
Match Points Saved | 0 | 0 |
Max Points In A Row | 4 | 10 |
Service Games Won | 79% (11/14) | 94% (15/16) |
Return Games Won | 6% (1/16) | 21% (3/14) |
Total Games Won | 40% (12/30) | 60% (18/30) |
Max Games In A Row | 3 | 3 |
Match Duration | 2h 21m |
Cincinnati 2025 Quarter-final Results & Stats
Sabalenka A. (Wrl) – Rybakina E. (Kaz) 1-6 4-6
Sabalenka vs Rybakina – Match Stats
Statistic | Sabalenka | Rybakina |
---|---|---|
Dominance Ratio | 0.75 | 1.33 |
Serve Rating | 239 | 303 |
Aces | 4 | 11 |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 |
1st Serve % | 53% (23/43) | 56% (36/64) |
1st Serve Points Won | 65% (15/23) | 81% (29/36) |
2nd Serve Points Won | 55% (11/20) | 56% (15/27) |
Break Points Saved | 40% (2/5) | 100% (5/5) |
Service Games | 63% (5/8) | 100% (9/9) |
Ace % | 9.3% | 17.2% |
Double Fault % | 2.3% | 1.6% |
Return Rating | 63 | 178 |
1st Return Points Won | 19% (7/36) | 35% (8/23) |
2nd Return Points Won | 44% (12/27) | 45% (9/20) |
Break Points Won | 0% (0/5) | 60% (3/5) |
Return Games | 0% (0/9) | 38% (3/8) |
Pressure Points | 20% (2/10) | 80% (8/10) |
Service Points | 60% (26/43) | 70% (45/64) |
Return Points | 30% (19/64) | 40% (17/43) |
Total Points | 42% (45/107) | 58% (62/107) |
Match Points Saved | 0 | 0 |
Max Points In A Row | 6 | 7 |
Service Games Won | 63% (5/8) | 100% (9/9) |
Return Games Won | 0% (0/9) | 38% (3/8) |
Total Games Won | 29% (5/17) | 71% (12/17) |
Max Games In A Row | 1 | 5 |
Injury Timeouts | 0 | 0 |
Match Duration | 1h 11m |
Swiatek I. (Pol) – Kalinskaya A. (Wrl) 6-3 6-4
Swiatek vs Kalinskaya – Full Match Stats
Statistic | Swiatek | Kalinskaya |
---|---|---|
Dominance Ratio | 1.68 | 0.59 |
Serve Rating | 290 | 231 |
Aces | 2 | 5 |
Double Faults | 3 | 5 |
1st Serve % | 55% (29/53) | 54% (34/63) |
1st Serve Points Won | 83% (24/29) | 62% (21/34) |
2nd Serve Points Won | 63% (15/24) | 48% (14/29) |
Break Points Saved | 50% (1/2) | 73% (8/11) |
Service Games | 90% (9/10) | 67% (6/9) |
Ace % | 3.8% | 7.9% |
Double Fault % | 5.7% | 7.9% |
Return Rating | 150 | 115 |
1st Return Points Won | 38% (13/34) | 17% (5/29) |
2nd Return Points Won | 52% (15/29) | 38% (9/24) |
Break Points Won | 27% (3/11) | 50% (1/2) |
Return Games | 33% (3/9) | 10% (1/10) |
Pressure Points | 31% (4/13) | 69% (9/13) |
Service Points | 74% (39/53) | 56% (35/63) |
Return Points | 44% (28/63) | 26% (14/53) |
Total Points | 58% (67/116) | 42% (49/116) |
Match Points Saved | 0 | 4 |
Max Points In A Row | 7 | 6 |
Service Games | 90% (9/10) | 67% (6/9) |
Return Games | 33% (3/9) | 10% (1/10) |
Total Games | 63% (12/19) | 37% (7/19) |
Max Games In A Row | 3 | 2 |
Injury Timeouts | 0 | 0 |
Match Duration | 1h 31m |
Paolini J. (Ita) – Gauff C. (Usa) 2-6 6-4 6-3
Paolini vs Gauff – Match Stats
Statistic | Paolini | Gauff |
---|---|---|
Dominance Ratio | 0.99 | 1.01 |
Serve Rating | 203 | 181 |
Aces | 0 | 2 |
Double Faults | 2 | 16 |
1st Serve % | 62% (54/87) | 54% (45/84) |
1st Serve Points Won | 57% (31/54) | 67% (30/45) |
2nd Serve Points Won | 36% (12/33) | 28% (11/39) |
Break Points Saved | 30% (3/10) | 53% (8/15) |
Service Games | 50% (7/14) | 46% (6/13) |
Ace % | 0% | 2.4% |
Double Fault % | 2.3% | 19% |
Return Rating | 206 | 227 |
1st Return Points Won | 33% (15/45) | 43% (23/54) |
2nd Return Points Won | 72% (28/39) | 64% (21/33) |
Break Points Won | 47% (7/15) | 70% (7/10) |
Return Games | 54% (7/13) | 50% (7/14) |
Pressure Points | 40% (10/25) | 60% (15/25) |
Service Points | 49% (43/87) | 50% (42/84) |
Return Points | 50% (42/84) | 51% (44/87) |
Total Points | 50% (85/171) | 50% (86/171) |
Match Points Saved | 0 | 2 |
Max Points In A Row | 7 | 9 |
Service Games | 50% (7/14) | 46% (6/13) |
Return Games | 54% (7/13) | 50% (7/14) |
Total Games | 52% (14/27) | 48% (13/27) |
Max Games In A Row | 3 | 3 |
Injury Timeouts | 0 | 0 |
Match Duration | 1h 59m |
Gracheva V. (Fra) – Kudermetova V. (Wrl) 1-6 2-6
Gracheva vs Kudermetova – Match Stats
Statistic | Gracheva | Kudermetova |
---|---|---|
Dominance Ratio | 0.47 | 2.13 |
Serve Rating | 187 | 313 |
Aces | 1 | 4 |
Double Faults | 5 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 63% (33/52) | 57% (21/37) |
1st Serve Points Won | 52% (17/33) | 71% (15/21) |
2nd Serve Points Won | 38% (8/21) | 81% (13/16) |
Break Points Saved | 38% (3/8) | – (0/0) |
Service Games | 38% (3/8) | 100% (7/7) |
Ace % | 1.9% | 10.8% |
Double Fault % | 9.6% | 0% |
Return Rating | 48 | 236 |
1st Return Points Won | 29% (6/21) | 48% (16/33) |
2nd Return Points Won | 19% (3/16) | 62% (13/21) |
Break Points Won | – (0/0) | 63% (5/8) |
Return Games | 0% (0/7) | 63% (5/8) |
Pressure Points | 38% (3/8) | 63% (5/8) |
Service Points | 48% (25/52) | 76% (28/37) |
Return Points | 24% (9/37) | 52% (27/52) |
Total Points | 38% (34/89) | 62% (55/89) |
Match Points Saved | 1 | 0 |
Max Points In A Row | 4 | 5 |
Service Games | 38% (3/8) | 100% (7/7) |
Return Games | 0% (0/7) | 63% (5/8) |
Total Games | 20% (3/15) | 80% (12/15) |
Max Games In A Row | 1 | 7 |
Injury Timeouts | 0 | 0 |
Match Duration | 1h 05m |
Cincinnati 2025 Round of 16 Results
Alexandrova E. (Wrl) – Kalinskaya A. (Wrl) 6-3 6-7 1-6
Bronzetti L. (Ita) – Coco Gauff (Usa) 2-6 4-6
Kudermetova V. (Wrl) – Linette M. (Pol) 6-4 6-3
Paolini J. (Ita) – Krejcikova B. (Cze) 6-1 6-2
Rybakina E. (Kaz) – Keys M. (Usa) 6-7 6-4 6-2
Seidel E. (Ger) – Gracheva V. (Fra) 6-2 1-6 1-6
Sabalenka A. (Wrl) – Bouzas Maneiro J. (Esp) 6-1 7-5
Swiatek I. (Pol) – Cirstea S. (Rou) 6-4 6-3
Cincinnati 2025 Round of 32 Results
Rybakina E. (Kaz) – Mertens E. (Bel) 4-6 6-3 7-5
Bronzetti L. (Ita) – Ostapenko J. (Lat) 1-6 6-3 6-4
Jovic I. (Usa) – Krejcikova B. (Cze) 4-6 6-3 2-6
Linette M. (Pol) – Pegula J. (Usa) 7-6 3-6 6-3 (as continued on August 13)
Paolini J. (Ita) – Krueger A. (Usa) 7-6 6-1
Seidel E. (Ger) – Kessler M. (Usa) 6-4 2-6 7-6
Tauson C. (Den) – Kudermetova V. (Wrl) 6-3 6-7 4-6 (August 13)
Yastremska D. (Ukr) – Gauff C. (Usa) Walkover
Gracheva V. (Fra) – Muchova K. (Cze) 6-2 6-4
Swiatek I. (Pol) – Kostyuk M. (Ukr) Walkover
Alexandrova E. (Wrl) – Joint M. (Aus) 6-4 6-3
Bouzas Maneiro J. (Esp) – Townsend T. (Usa) 6-4 6-1
Cirstea S. (Rou) – Yuan Y. (Chn) 6-7 6-4 6-4
Ito A. (Jpn) – Keys M. (Usa) 4-6 0-6
Kalinskaya A. (Wrl) – Anisimova A. (Usa) 7-5 6-4
Sabalenka A. (Wrl) – Raducanu E. (Gbr) 7-6 4-6 7-6
Cincinnati 2025 Round of 64 Results
Sabalenka A. (Wrl) – Vondrousova M. (Cze) 7-5 6-1
Jeanjean L. (Fra) – Anisimova A. (Usa) Walkover
Birrell K. (Aus) – Pegula J. (Usa) 4-6 3-6
Garcia C. (Fra) – Muchova K. (Cze) 6-7(3-7) 6-7(0-7)
McNally C. (Usa) – Kessler M. (Usa) 4-6 3-6
Noskova L. (Cze) – Jovic I. (Usa) 3-6 0-6
Kasatkina D. (Aus) – Bronzetti L. (Ita) 3-6 6-1 4-6
Kenin S. (Usa) – Gracheva V. (Fra) 7-6 (9-7) 3-6 3-6
Krejcikova B. (Cze) – Svitolina E. (Ukr) 2-6 6-4 6-3
Kudermetova V. (Wrl) – Bencic B. (Sui) 6-4 7-6
Linette M. (Pol) – Sramkova R. (Svk) 7-6 6-0
Navarro E. (Usa) – Seidel E. (Ger) 4-6 6-1 4-6
Osorio C. (Col) – Ostapenko J. (Lat) Walkover
Paolini J. (Ita) – Sakkari M. (Gre) 7-6 7-6
Sevastova A. (Lat) – Krueger A. (Usa) 4-6 6-0 3-6
Tauson C. (Den) – Tomljanovic A. (Aus) 6-3 6-7 6-4
Wang Xin. (Chn) – Gauff C. (Usa) 3-6 2-6
Yastremska D. (Ukr) – Tomova V. (Bul) 6-4 2-6 6-2
Maria T. (Ger) – Kostyuk M. (Ukr) 0-6 1-6
Pavlyuchenkova A. (Wrl) – Ito A. (Jpn) 1-6 6-4 4-6
Swiatek I. (Pol) – Potapova A. (Wrl) 6-1 6-4
Iga Swiatek dominated her 1-hour, 14-minute clash with Anastasia Potapova, winning 63% of total points and holding an imposing dominance ratio of 1.85. The world No.1 was nearly untouchable on serve, claiming 90% of her first-serve points and winning 8 of 9 service games, while breaking Potapova four times. Her return game was just as sharp, limiting the Russian to only 10% of first-serve points won on return. Swiatek’s consistency in pressure moments — taking 8 of 10 key points — sealed a commanding 12–5 edge in total games.
Match Stats:
Statistic | Swiatek | Potapova |
---|---|---|
Dominance Ratio | 1.85 | 0.54 |
Serve Rating | 280 | 190 |
Aces | 4 | 2 |
Double Faults | 4 | 4 |
1st Serve % | 58% (30/52) | 47% (21/45) |
1st Serve Points Won | 90% (27/30) | 62% (13/21) |
2nd Serve Points Won | 43% (9/21) | 33% (8/24) |
Break Points Saved | 80% (4/5) | 20% (1/5) |
Service Games | 89% (8/9) | 50% (4/8) |
Ace % | 7.7% | 4.4% |
Double Fault % | 7.7% | 8.9% |
Return Rating | 235 | 98 |
1st Return Points Won | 38% (8/21) | 10% (3/30) |
2nd Return Points Won | 67% (16/24) | 57% (12/21) |
Break Points Won | 80% (4/5) | 20% (1/5) |
Return Games | 50% (4/8) | 11% (1/9) |
Pressure Points | 80% (8/10) | 20% (2/10) |
Service Points | 71% (37/52) | 47% (21/45) |
Return Points | 53% (24/45) | 29% (15/52) |
Total Points | 63% (61/97) | 37% (36/97) |
Match Points Saved | 0 | 1 |
Max Points In A Row | 9 | 5 |
Service Games Won % | 89% (8/9) | 50% (4/8) |
Return Games Won % | 50% (4/8) | 11% (1/9) |
Total Games Won % | 71% (12/17) | 29% (5/17) |
Max Games In A Row | 5 | 2 |
Injury Timeouts | 0 | 0 |
Match Duration | 1h 14m |
Fernandez L. (Can) – Bouzas Maneiro J. (Esp) 3-6 3-6
Frech M. (Pol) – Cirstea S. (Rou) 6-7 6-2 4-6
Joint M. (Aus) – Haddad Maia B. (Bra) 6-4 4-6 6-4
Lys E. (Ger) – Keys M. (Usa) 6-1 3-6 6-7(1-7)
In a tightly contested two-hour, eight-minute battle, Madison Keys edged past Eva Lys by the slimmest of margins, winning 51% of the total points. Keys’ 12 aces proved decisive, giving her a stronger first-serve edge at 67% points won compared to Lys’ 59%. While Lys excelled on return, converting 42% of break chances and winning more return games (5 to 4), Keys balanced the scales with bigger service streaks, including a run of 10 straight points. Both players matched in double faults at six apiece, but Keys’ ability to save two match points underscored her resilience under pressure.
Match Stats
Statistic | Lys | Keys |
---|---|---|
Dominance Ratio | 0.95 | 1.05 |
Serve Rating | 234 | 239 |
Aces | 0 | 12 |
Double Faults | 6 | 6 |
1st Serve % | 63% (66/104) | 60% (55/91) |
1st Serve Points Won | 59% (39/66) | 67% (37/55) |
2nd Serve Points Won | 47% (18/38) | 42% (15/36) |
Break Points Saved | 69% (9/13) | 58% (7/12) |
Service Games | 71% (10/14) | 64% (9/14) |
Ace % | 0% | 13.2% |
Double Fault % | 5.8% | 6.6% |
Return Rating | 169 | 154 |
1st Return Points Won | 33% (18/55) | 41% (27/66) |
2nd Return Points Won | 58% (21/36) | 53% (20/38) |
Break Points Won | 42% (5/12) | 31% (4/13) |
Return Games | 36% (5/14) | 29% (4/14) |
Pressure Points | 56% (14/25) | 44% (11/25) |
Service Points | 55% (57/104) | 57% (52/91) |
Return Points | 43% (39/91) | 45% (47/104) |
Total Points | 49% (96/195) | 51% (99/195) |
Match Points Saved | 0 | 2 |
Max Points In A Row | 6 | 10 |
Service Games Won % | 71% (10/14) | 64% (9/14) |
Return Games Won % | 36% (5/14) | 29% (4/14) |
Total Games Won % | 54% (15/28) | 46% (13/28) |
Max Games In A Row | 5 | 3 |
Injury Timeouts | 0 | 0 |
Match Duration | 2h 08m |
Danilovic O. (Srb) – Raducanu E. (Gbr) 3-6 2-6
Ngounoue C. (Usa) – Mertens E. (Bel) 6-3 6-7 5-7
Townsend T. (Usa) – Samsonova L. (Wrl) 6-2 6-4
Rybakina E. (Kaz) – Zarazua R. (Mex) 4-6 6-0 7-5
Alexandrova E. (Wrl) – Sun L. (Nzl) 6-4 6-2
Kalinskaya A. (Wrl) – Stearns P. (Usa) 7-6(7-4) 4-6 6-1
Yuan Y. (Chn) – Shnaider D. (Wrl) 6-4 1-6 6-3
Cincinnati 2025 Round of 128 Results
Parks A. (Usa) – Krejcikova B. (Cze) 4-6 6-4 0-6
Bucsa C. (Esp) – Yuan Y. (Chn) 2-6 2-6
Jovic I. (Usa) – Sierra S. (Arg) 6-3 7-6
McNally C. (Gbr) – Inglis M (Aus) 6-2 6-3
CANCELLED Mboko V. (Can) – Shnaider D. (Wrl)
CANCELLED Noskova L. (Cze) – Osaka N. (Jpn)
Ngounoue C. (Usa) – Baptiste H. (Usa) 6-1 4-6 6-1
Stearns P. (Usa) – Wang Y. (Chn) 6-4 6-3
Dolehide C. (Usa) – Sramkova R. (Svk) 6-1 4-6 6-7
Sun L. (Nzl) – Ruzic A. (Cro) 6-4 6-4
Zhu L. (Chn) – Bronzetti L. (Ita) 7-6 2-6 6-7
Kartal S. (Gbr) – Garcia C. (Fra) 7-5 4-6 3-6
Starodubtseva Y. (Ukr) – Jeanjean L. (Fra) 5-7 6-1 4-6
Bondar A. (Hun) – Tomljanovic A. (Aus) 6-7 4-6
Collins D. (Usa) – Townsend T. (Usa) 4-6 6-7
Blinkova A. (Wrl) – Birrell K. (Aus) 2-6 1-6
Gracheva V. (Fra) – Volynets K. (Usa) 6-4 3-6 6-3
Kudermetova P. (Wrl) – Seidel E. (Ger) 6-1 3-6 2-6
Uchijima M. (Jpn) – Osorio C. (Col) 5-7 6-1 4-6
Rakhimova K. (Wrl) – Sakkari M. (Gre) 3-6 6-3 2-6
Li A. (Usa) – Tomova V. (Bul) 4-6 5-7
Wang Xin. (Chn) – Arango E. (Col) 7-6 6-3
Sevastova A. (Lat) – Bektas E. (Usa) 6-4 6-7 6-1
Lamens S. (Ned) – Kudermetova V. (Wrl) 1-6 3-6
Cirstea S. (Rou) – Vekic D. (Cro) 6-1 4-6 6-3
Joint M. (Aus) – Minnen G. (Bel) 6-2 6-3
Potapova A. (Wrl) – Siegemund L. (Ger) 6-4 6-4
Vondrousova M. (Cze) – Cristian J. (Rou) 6-3 6-1
Zarazua R. (Mex) – Putintseva Y. (Kaz) 3-6 6-4 6-2
Ito A. (Jpn) – Ruse G. (Rou) 6-2 7-6
Williams V. (Usa) – Bouzas Maneiro J. (Esp) 4-6 4-6
Pera B. (Usa) – Lys E. (Ger) 2-6 6-4 5-7
Danilovic O. (Srb) – Boulter K. (Gbr) 6-0 7-5
Osuigwe W. (Usa) – Maria T. (Ger) 2-6 3-6
Players BYE: Aryna Sabalenka, Emma Raducanu, Leylah Fernandez, Ludmilla Samsonova, Elena Rybakina, Elise Mertens, Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova, Madison Keys, Iga Swiatek, Marta Kostyuk, Magdalena Frech, Diana Shnaider, Ekaterina Alexandrova, Beatriz Haddad Maia, Anna Kalinskaya, Amanda Anisimova, Emma Navarro, Mccartney Kessler, Sofia Kenin, Karolina Muchova, Clara Tauson, Belinda Bencic, Magda Linette, Jessica Pegula, Jasmine Paolini, Ashlyn Krueger, Linda Noskova, Elina Svitolina, Daria Kasatkina, Dayana Yastremska, Jelena Ostapenko, and Coco Gauff.
Cincinnati 2025 Qualifications – Finals
Ruzic A. (Cro) – Hozumi E. (Jpn) 6-3 6-1
Bucsa C. (Esp) – Osuigwe W. (Usa) 3-6 3-6
Galfi D. (Hun) – Ito A. (Jpn) 3-6 4-6
Jovic I. (Usa) – Gracheva V. (Fra) 3-6 4-6
Yuan Y. (Chn) – Ngounoue C. (Usa) 6-3 4-6 3-6
Inglis M. (Aus) – Zakharova A. (Wrl) 4-6 6-2 6-2
Jeanjean L. (Fra) – Masarova R. (Sui) 6-3 6-4
Ruzic A. (Cro) – Arconada U. M. (Usa) 6-2 6-4
Osuigwe W. (Usa) – Sasnovich A. (Wrl) 7-6 6-4
Jacquemot E. (Fra) – Tomova V. (Bul) 4-6 1-6
Hon P. (Aus) – Seidel E. (Ger) 7-5 3-6 4-6
Sierra S. (Arg) – Bektas E. (Usa) 3-6 5-7
Cincinnati 2025 Qualifications – Semi-Finals
Buzarnescu M. (Rou) – Gracheva V. (Fra) 0-6 2-6
Ngounoue C. (Usa) – Gadecki O. (Aus) 6-7 6-3 6-3
Chirico L. (Usa) – Tomova V. (Bul) 2-6 1-6
Cocciaretto E. (Ita) – Hon P. (Aus) 4-6 4-6
Jacquemot E. (Fra) – Juvan K. (Slo) 2-6 7-5 7-5
Jovic I. (Usa) – Eikeri U. (Nor) 7-5 6-2
Seidel E. (Ger) – Lepchenko V. (Usa) 6-2 6-1
Rakhimova K. (Wrl) – Burrage J. (Gbr) 7-6 6-2
Siegemund L. (Ger) – Aiava D. (Aus) 6-1 6-1
Watson H. (Gbr) – Zakharova A. (Wrl) 2-6 3-6
Mandlik E. (Usa) – Marino R. (Can) 2-6 6-7
Sierra S. (Arg) – Trevisan M. (Ita) 6-3 6-4
Guo H. (Chn) – Todoni A. A. (Rou) 6-1 6-0
Parrizas-Diaz N. (Esp) – Inglis M. (Aus) 6-1 6-7 2-6
Bektas E. (Usa) – Kawa K. (Pol) 6-1 6-1
Bucsa C. (Esp) – Mateas M. (Usa) 6-1 6-1
Hozumi E. (Jpn) – Shibahara E. (Jpn) 6-4 4-6 6-2
Yuan Y. (Chn) – Sharma A. (Aus) 6-4 6-2
Krunic A. (Srb) – Ito A. (Jpn) 6-4 4-6 2-6
Galfi D. (Hun) – Hibino N. (Jpn) 2-6 6-3 6-3
Rakhimova K. (Wrl) – Marino R. (Can) 3-6 6-4 7-5
Siegemund L. (Ger) – Guo H. (Chn) 6-2 6-7 6-3
Davis L. (Usa) – Masarova (Sui) 2-6 4-6
Jeanjean L. (Fra) – Zhao C. (Can) 6-1 4-6 6-3