Anime-style illustration of two powerful female tennis players locking rackets, with radiant energy and the Cincinnati skyline in the background

2025 Cincinnati WTA Results (Confirmed & Updated) Including Qualifiers – Detailed Stats From Quarterfinals to Final

The 2025 WTA 1000 Cincinnati Open runs from August 7–17 with a supersized 96-player field—up from 56 last year—on the fast outdoor hard courts of the Lindner Family Tennis Center. As the final major stop before the US Open, it promises a stacked lineup of the WTA Tour’s best.

Sabalenka Returned to Defend Her Crown but Fails

World No. 1 Aryna Sabalenka was back after a month-long absence, aiming to defend her Cincinnati title. She was joined by 2023 champion Coco Gauff, four-time major winner Iga Swiatek, and fellow Top 10 contenders Jessica Pegula, Amanda Anisimova, Madison Keys, and Elena Rybakina.
Anisimova was the first to bow out, falling to Anna Kalinskaya in the Round of 32. Keys was defeated by Rybakina, who then faced Sabalenka. Pegula could not get past Poland’s Magda Linette, who in turn lost to surprise package Veronika Kudermetova. Kudermetova’s quarter-final opponent turned out to be the biggest shock of the tournament — Varvara Gracheva. The Frenchwoman had put together a string of six consecutive wins to earn her place in the last eight.

Notable Absences but Surprise Entrants

Big names missing included Zheng Qinwen and Paula Badosa (injuries), as well as Montreal finalist Naomi Osaka and champion Victoria Mboko, both sidelined after deep runs in Canada. Cincinnati still delivered surprises — Venus Williams returned but fell to Spain’s in-form Jessica Bouzas Maneiro in the first round, while Caroline Garcia made her wildcard count and went on to face Karolina Muchova in the Round of 64. Muchova won but could not make it to the pre-quarters.

American Hopes Ran High

The U.S. boasted five of the top eight seeds — Gauff (No. 2), Pegula (No. 4), Anisimova (No. 5), Keys (No. 6), and Navarro (No. 8). Pegula, last year’s finalist, was eager for revenge after falling to Sabalenka in 2024. With home support and familiar courts, an American champion seemed within reach. However, by the quarterfinals, only Coco Gauff had remained. She then fell to Jasmine Paolini.

Conclusion: Swiatek Solidifies, Paolini Soars

The 2025 Cincinnati Open delivered on every front—elite matchups, breakout performances, and a final that showcased two players trending in opposite, yet equally compelling, directions. For Iga Swiatek, the title wasn’t just another addition to her growing trophy cabinet—it was a statement. Her win on one of the tour’s fastest hard courts confirmed a new chapter in her career: one where she’s no longer just dominant on clay, but dangerous everywhere. Entering the US Open as the woman to beat feels not only earned but inevitable.

For Jasmine Paolini, Cincinnati was another validation of her evolution. She didn’t just make a final—she fought tooth and nail through a stacked draw, beating Coco Gauff on American soil and pushing Swiatek to find her very best. Paolini proved she belongs among the game’s elite. Her rise continues—and New York will be watching.

Cincinnati 2025 Final Result & Stats

Iga Swiatek (Pol) defeated Jasmine Paolini (Ita) 7-5 6-4

Swiatek vs Paolini – Match Stats

Statistic Swiatek Paolini
Dominance Ratio1.180.85
Serve Rating236196
Aces90
Double Faults72
1st Serve %59% (46/78)58% (37/64)
1st Serve Points Won67% (31/46)65% (24/37)
2nd Serve Points Won44% (14/32)30% (8/27)
Break Points Saved60% (6/10)0% (0/6)
Service Games64% (7/11)45% (5/11)
Ace %11.5%0%
Double Fault %9%3.1%
Return Rating260165
1st Return Points Won35% (13/37)33% (15/46)
2nd Return Points Won70% (19/27)56% (18/32)
Break Points Won100% (6/6)40% (4/10)
Return Games55% (6/11)36% (4/11)
Pressure Points75% (12/16)25% (4/16)
Service Points58% (45/78)50% (32/64)
Return Points50% (32/64)42% (33/78)
Total Points54% (77/142)46% (65/142)
Match Points Saved00
Max Points In A Row65
Service Games64% (7/11)45% (5/11)
Return Games55% (6/11)36% (4/11)
Total Games59% (13/22)41% (9/22)
Max Games In A Row53
Injury Timeouts00
Match Duration1h 50m

Full extended match report right here

Cincinnati 2025 Semi-Finals Results & Stats

Preview & SFs Predictions

Elena Rybakina (Kaz) – Iga Swiatek (Pol) 5-7 3-6

Rybakina vs Swiatek – Match Stats

Statistic Rybakina Swiatek
Dominance Ratio0.691.45
Serve Rating248301
Aces107
Double Faults13
1st Serve %58% (38/66)67% (39/58)
1st Serve Points Won63% (24/38)87% (34/39)
2nd Serve Points Won48% (13/27)53% (10/19)
Break Points Saved67% (6/9)75% (3/4)
Service Games70% (7/10)90% (9/10)
Ace %15.2%12.1%
Double Fault %1.5%5.2%
Return Rating95152
1st Return Points Won13% (5/39)37% (14/38)
2nd Return Points Won47% (9/19)52% (14/27)
Break Points Won25% (1/4)33% (3/9)
Return Games10% (1/10)30% (3/10)
Pressure Points54% (7/13)46% (6/13)
Service Points58% (38/66)71% (41/58)
Return Points29% (17/58)42% (28/66)
Total Points44% (55/124)56% (69/124)
Match Points Saved20
Max Points In A Row710
Service Games70% (7/10)90% (9/10)
Return Games10% (1/10)30% (3/10)
Total Games40% (8/20)60% (12/20)
Max Games In A Row35
Injury Timeouts00
Match Duration1h 35m

Veronika Kudermetova (Wrl) – Jasmine Paolini (Ita) 3-6 7-6(7-2) 3-6

Kudermetova vs Paolini – Match Stats

Statistic Kudermetova Paolini
Dominance Ratio0.781.27
Serve Rating264305
Aces102
Double Faults42
1st Serve %56% (48/86)71% (70/99)
1st Serve Points Won81% (39/48)74% (52/70)
2nd Serve Points Won42% (16/38)66% (19/29)
Break Points Saved0% (0/3)83% (5/6)
Service Games79% (11/14)94% (15/16)
Ace %11.6%2%
Double Fault %4.7%2%
Return Rating83198
1st Return Points Won26% (18/70)19% (9/48)
2nd Return Points Won34% (10/29)58% (22/38)
Break Points Won17% (1/6)100% (3/3)
Return Games6% (1/16)21% (3/14)
Pressure Points11% (1/9)89% (8/9)
Service Points64% (55/86)72% (71/99)
Return Points28% (28/99)36% (31/86)
Total Points45% (83/185)55% (102/185)
Match Points Saved00
Max Points In A Row410
Service Games Won79% (11/14)94% (15/16)
Return Games Won6% (1/16)21% (3/14)
Total Games Won40% (12/30)60% (18/30)
Max Games In A Row33
Match Duration2h 21m

Cincinnati 2025 Quarter-final Results & Stats

Sabalenka A. (Wrl) – Rybakina E. (Kaz) 1-6 4-6

Sabalenka vs Rybakina – Match Stats

Statistical Breakdown – Sabalenka vs Rybakina
Statistic Sabalenka Rybakina
Dominance Ratio 0.75 1.33
Serve Rating 239 303
Aces 4 11
Double Faults 1 1
1st Serve % 53% (23/43) 56% (36/64)
1st Serve Points Won 65% (15/23) 81% (29/36)
2nd Serve Points Won 55% (11/20) 56% (15/27)
Break Points Saved 40% (2/5) 100% (5/5)
Service Games 63% (5/8) 100% (9/9)
Ace % 9.3% 17.2%
Double Fault % 2.3% 1.6%
Return Rating 63 178
1st Return Points Won 19% (7/36) 35% (8/23)
2nd Return Points Won 44% (12/27) 45% (9/20)
Break Points Won 0% (0/5) 60% (3/5)
Return Games 0% (0/9) 38% (3/8)
Pressure Points 20% (2/10) 80% (8/10)
Service Points 60% (26/43) 70% (45/64)
Return Points 30% (19/64) 40% (17/43)
Total Points 42% (45/107) 58% (62/107)
Match Points Saved 0 0
Max Points In A Row 6 7
Service Games Won 63% (5/8) 100% (9/9)
Return Games Won 0% (0/9) 38% (3/8)
Total Games Won 29% (5/17) 71% (12/17)
Max Games In A Row 1 5
Injury Timeouts 0 0
Match Duration 1h 11m

Swiatek I. (Pol) – Kalinskaya A. (Wrl) 6-3 6-4

Swiatek vs Kalinskaya – Full Match Stats

Statistical Breakdown – Swiatek vs Kalinskaya
StatisticSwiatekKalinskaya
Dominance Ratio1.680.59
Serve Rating290231
Aces25
Double Faults35
1st Serve %55% (29/53)54% (34/63)
1st Serve Points Won83% (24/29)62% (21/34)
2nd Serve Points Won63% (15/24)48% (14/29)
Break Points Saved50% (1/2)73% (8/11)
Service Games90% (9/10)67% (6/9)
Ace %3.8%7.9%
Double Fault %5.7%7.9%
Return Rating150115
1st Return Points Won38% (13/34)17% (5/29)
2nd Return Points Won52% (15/29)38% (9/24)
Break Points Won27% (3/11)50% (1/2)
Return Games33% (3/9)10% (1/10)
Pressure Points31% (4/13)69% (9/13)
Service Points74% (39/53)56% (35/63)
Return Points44% (28/63)26% (14/53)
Total Points58% (67/116)42% (49/116)
Match Points Saved04
Max Points In A Row76
Service Games90% (9/10)67% (6/9)
Return Games33% (3/9)10% (1/10)
Total Games63% (12/19)37% (7/19)
Max Games In A Row32
Injury Timeouts00
Match Duration1h 31m

Paolini J. (Ita) – Gauff C. (Usa) 2-6 6-4 6-3

Paolini vs Gauff – Match Stats

Statistic Paolini Gauff
Dominance Ratio0.991.01
Serve Rating203181
Aces02
Double Faults216
1st Serve %62% (54/87)54% (45/84)
1st Serve Points Won57% (31/54)67% (30/45)
2nd Serve Points Won36% (12/33)28% (11/39)
Break Points Saved30% (3/10)53% (8/15)
Service Games50% (7/14)46% (6/13)
Ace %0%2.4%
Double Fault %2.3%19%
Return Rating206227
1st Return Points Won33% (15/45)43% (23/54)
2nd Return Points Won72% (28/39)64% (21/33)
Break Points Won47% (7/15)70% (7/10)
Return Games54% (7/13)50% (7/14)
Pressure Points40% (10/25)60% (15/25)
Service Points49% (43/87)50% (42/84)
Return Points50% (42/84)51% (44/87)
Total Points50% (85/171)50% (86/171)
Match Points Saved02
Max Points In A Row79
Service Games50% (7/14)46% (6/13)
Return Games54% (7/13)50% (7/14)
Total Games52% (14/27)48% (13/27)
Max Games In A Row33
Injury Timeouts00
Match Duration1h 59m

Gracheva V. (Fra) – Kudermetova V. (Wrl) 1-6 2-6

Gracheva vs Kudermetova – Match Stats

Statistical Breakdown – Gracheva vs Kudermetova
Statistic Gracheva Kudermetova
Dominance Ratio0.472.13
Serve Rating187313
Aces14
Double Faults50
1st Serve %63% (33/52)57% (21/37)
1st Serve Points Won52% (17/33)71% (15/21)
2nd Serve Points Won38% (8/21)81% (13/16)
Break Points Saved38% (3/8)– (0/0)
Service Games38% (3/8)100% (7/7)
Ace %1.9%10.8%
Double Fault %9.6%0%
Return Rating48236
1st Return Points Won29% (6/21)48% (16/33)
2nd Return Points Won19% (3/16)62% (13/21)
Break Points Won– (0/0)63% (5/8)
Return Games0% (0/7)63% (5/8)
Pressure Points38% (3/8)63% (5/8)
Service Points48% (25/52)76% (28/37)
Return Points24% (9/37)52% (27/52)
Total Points38% (34/89)62% (55/89)
Match Points Saved10
Max Points In A Row45
Service Games38% (3/8)100% (7/7)
Return Games0% (0/7)63% (5/8)
Total Games20% (3/15)80% (12/15)
Max Games In A Row17
Injury Timeouts00
Match Duration1h 05m

Cincinnati 2025 Round of 16 Results

Alexandrova E. (Wrl) – Kalinskaya A. (Wrl) 6-3 6-7 1-6
Bronzetti L. (Ita) – Coco Gauff (Usa) 2-6 4-6
Kudermetova V. (Wrl) – Linette M. (Pol) 6-4 6-3
Paolini J. (Ita) – Krejcikova B. (Cze) 6-1 6-2
Rybakina E. (Kaz) – Keys M. (Usa) 6-7 6-4 6-2
Seidel E. (Ger) – Gracheva V. (Fra) 6-2 1-6 1-6
Sabalenka A. (Wrl) – Bouzas Maneiro J. (Esp) 6-1 7-5
Swiatek I. (Pol) – Cirstea S. (Rou) 6-4 6-3

Cincinnati 2025 Round of 32 Results

Rybakina E. (Kaz) – Mertens E. (Bel) 4-6 6-3 7-5
Bronzetti L. (Ita) – Ostapenko J. (Lat) 1-6 6-3 6-4
Jovic I. (Usa) – Krejcikova B. (Cze) 4-6 6-3 2-6
Linette M. (Pol) – Pegula J. (Usa) 7-6 3-6 6-3 (as continued on August 13)
Paolini J. (Ita) – Krueger A. (Usa) 7-6 6-1
Seidel E. (Ger) – Kessler M. (Usa) 6-4 2-6 7-6
Tauson C. (Den) – Kudermetova V. (Wrl) 6-3 6-7 4-6 (August 13)
Yastremska D. (Ukr) – Gauff C. (Usa) Walkover
Gracheva V. (Fra) – Muchova K. (Cze) 6-2 6-4

Swiatek I. (Pol) – Kostyuk M. (Ukr) Walkover
Alexandrova E. (Wrl) – Joint M. (Aus) 6-4 6-3
Bouzas Maneiro J. (Esp) – Townsend T. (Usa) 6-4 6-1
Cirstea S. (Rou) – Yuan Y. (Chn) 6-7 6-4 6-4
Ito A. (Jpn) – Keys M. (Usa) 4-6 0-6
Kalinskaya A. (Wrl) – Anisimova A. (Usa) 7-5 6-4
Sabalenka A. (Wrl) – Raducanu E. (Gbr) 7-6 4-6 7-6

Cincinnati 2025 Round of 64 Results

Sabalenka A. (Wrl) – Vondrousova M. (Cze) 7-5 6-1
Jeanjean L. (Fra) – Anisimova A. (Usa) Walkover
Birrell K. (Aus) – Pegula J. (Usa) 4-6 3-6
Garcia C. (Fra) – Muchova K. (Cze) 6-7(3-7) 6-7(0-7)
McNally C. (Usa) – Kessler M. (Usa) 4-6 3-6
Noskova L. (Cze) – Jovic I. (Usa) 3-6 0-6
Kasatkina D. (Aus) – Bronzetti L. (Ita) 3-6 6-1 4-6
Kenin S. (Usa) – Gracheva V. (Fra) 7-6 (9-7) 3-6 3-6
Krejcikova B. (Cze) – Svitolina E. (Ukr) 2-6 6-4 6-3
Kudermetova V. (Wrl) – Bencic B. (Sui) 6-4 7-6
Linette M. (Pol) – Sramkova R. (Svk) 7-6 6-0
Navarro E. (Usa) – Seidel E. (Ger) 4-6 6-1 4-6
Osorio C. (Col) – Ostapenko J. (Lat) Walkover
Paolini J. (Ita) – Sakkari M. (Gre) 7-6 7-6
Sevastova A. (Lat) – Krueger A. (Usa) 4-6 6-0 3-6
Tauson C. (Den) – Tomljanovic A. (Aus) 6-3 6-7 6-4
Wang Xin. (Chn) – Gauff C. (Usa) 3-6 2-6
Yastremska D. (Ukr) – Tomova V. (Bul) 6-4 2-6 6-2

Maria T. (Ger) – Kostyuk M. (Ukr) 0-6 1-6
Pavlyuchenkova A. (Wrl) – Ito A. (Jpn) 1-6 6-4 4-6
Swiatek I. (Pol) – Potapova A. (Wrl) 6-1 6-4
Iga Swiatek dominated her 1-hour, 14-minute clash with Anastasia Potapova, winning 63% of total points and holding an imposing dominance ratio of 1.85. The world No.1 was nearly untouchable on serve, claiming 90% of her first-serve points and winning 8 of 9 service games, while breaking Potapova four times. Her return game was just as sharp, limiting the Russian to only 10% of first-serve points won on return. Swiatek’s consistency in pressure moments — taking 8 of 10 key points — sealed a commanding 12–5 edge in total games.

Match Stats:

Statistical Breakdown – Swiatek vs Potapova
Statistic Swiatek Potapova
Dominance Ratio1.850.54
Serve Rating280190
Aces42
Double Faults44
1st Serve %58% (30/52)47% (21/45)
1st Serve Points Won90% (27/30)62% (13/21)
2nd Serve Points Won43% (9/21)33% (8/24)
Break Points Saved80% (4/5)20% (1/5)
Service Games89% (8/9)50% (4/8)
Ace %7.7%4.4%
Double Fault %7.7%8.9%
Return Rating23598
1st Return Points Won38% (8/21)10% (3/30)
2nd Return Points Won67% (16/24)57% (12/21)
Break Points Won80% (4/5)20% (1/5)
Return Games50% (4/8)11% (1/9)
Pressure Points80% (8/10)20% (2/10)
Service Points71% (37/52)47% (21/45)
Return Points53% (24/45)29% (15/52)
Total Points63% (61/97)37% (36/97)
Match Points Saved01
Max Points In A Row95
Service Games Won %89% (8/9)50% (4/8)
Return Games Won %50% (4/8)11% (1/9)
Total Games Won %71% (12/17)29% (5/17)
Max Games In A Row52
Injury Timeouts00
Match Duration1h 14m

Fernandez L. (Can) – Bouzas Maneiro J. (Esp) 3-6 3-6
Frech M. (Pol) – Cirstea S. (Rou) 6-7 6-2 4-6
Joint M. (Aus) – Haddad Maia B. (Bra) 6-4 4-6 6-4
Lys E. (Ger) – Keys M. (Usa) 6-1 3-6 6-7(1-7)
In a tightly contested two-hour, eight-minute battle, Madison Keys edged past Eva Lys by the slimmest of margins, winning 51% of the total points. Keys’ 12 aces proved decisive, giving her a stronger first-serve edge at 67% points won compared to Lys’ 59%. While Lys excelled on return, converting 42% of break chances and winning more return games (5 to 4), Keys balanced the scales with bigger service streaks, including a run of 10 straight points. Both players matched in double faults at six apiece, but Keys’ ability to save two match points underscored her resilience under pressure.

Match Stats

Statistical Breakdown – Lys vs Keys
Statistic Lys Keys
Dominance Ratio0.951.05
Serve Rating234239
Aces012
Double Faults66
1st Serve %63% (66/104)60% (55/91)
1st Serve Points Won59% (39/66)67% (37/55)
2nd Serve Points Won47% (18/38)42% (15/36)
Break Points Saved69% (9/13)58% (7/12)
Service Games71% (10/14)64% (9/14)
Ace %0%13.2%
Double Fault %5.8%6.6%
Return Rating169154
1st Return Points Won33% (18/55)41% (27/66)
2nd Return Points Won58% (21/36)53% (20/38)
Break Points Won42% (5/12)31% (4/13)
Return Games36% (5/14)29% (4/14)
Pressure Points56% (14/25)44% (11/25)
Service Points55% (57/104)57% (52/91)
Return Points43% (39/91)45% (47/104)
Total Points49% (96/195)51% (99/195)
Match Points Saved02
Max Points In A Row610
Service Games Won %71% (10/14)64% (9/14)
Return Games Won %36% (5/14)29% (4/14)
Total Games Won %54% (15/28)46% (13/28)
Max Games In A Row53
Injury Timeouts00
Match Duration2h 08m

Danilovic O. (Srb) – Raducanu E. (Gbr) 3-6 2-6
Ngounoue C. (Usa) – Mertens E. (Bel) 6-3 6-7 5-7
Townsend T. (Usa) – Samsonova L. (Wrl) 6-2 6-4
Rybakina E. (Kaz) – Zarazua R. (Mex) 4-6 6-0 7-5
Alexandrova E. (Wrl) – Sun L. (Nzl) 6-4 6-2
Kalinskaya A. (Wrl) – Stearns P. (Usa) 7-6(7-4) 4-6 6-1
Yuan Y. (Chn) – Shnaider D. (Wrl) 6-4 1-6 6-3

Cincinnati 2025 Round of 128 Results

Parks A. (Usa) – Krejcikova B. (Cze) 4-6 6-4 0-6
Bucsa C. (Esp) – Yuan Y. (Chn) 2-6 2-6
Jovic I. (Usa) – Sierra S. (Arg) 6-3 7-6
McNally C. (Gbr) – Inglis M (Aus) 6-2 6-3
CANCELLED Mboko V. (Can) – Shnaider D. (Wrl)
CANCELLED Noskova L. (Cze) – Osaka N. (Jpn)
Ngounoue C. (Usa) – Baptiste H. (Usa) 6-1 4-6 6-1
Stearns P. (Usa) – Wang Y. (Chn) 6-4 6-3
Dolehide C. (Usa) – Sramkova R. (Svk) 6-1 4-6 6-7
Sun L. (Nzl) – Ruzic A. (Cro) 6-4 6-4
Zhu L. (Chn) – Bronzetti L. (Ita) 7-6 2-6 6-7
Kartal S. (Gbr) – Garcia C. (Fra) 7-5 4-6 3-6
Starodubtseva Y. (Ukr) – Jeanjean L. (Fra) 5-7 6-1 4-6
Bondar A. (Hun) – Tomljanovic A. (Aus) 6-7 4-6
Collins D. (Usa) – Townsend T. (Usa) 4-6 6-7
Blinkova A. (Wrl) – Birrell K. (Aus) 2-6 1-6
Gracheva V. (Fra) – Volynets K. (Usa) 6-4 3-6 6-3
Kudermetova P. (Wrl) – Seidel E. (Ger) 6-1 3-6 2-6
Uchijima M. (Jpn) – Osorio C. (Col) 5-7 6-1 4-6
Rakhimova K. (Wrl) – Sakkari M. (Gre) 3-6 6-3 2-6
Li A. (Usa) – Tomova V. (Bul) 4-6 5-7
Wang Xin. (Chn) – Arango E. (Col) 7-6 6-3
Sevastova A. (Lat) – Bektas E. (Usa) 6-4 6-7 6-1
Lamens S. (Ned) – Kudermetova V. (Wrl) 1-6 3-6
Cirstea S. (Rou) – Vekic D. (Cro) 6-1 4-6 6-3
Joint M. (Aus) – Minnen G. (Bel) 6-2 6-3
Potapova A. (Wrl) – Siegemund L. (Ger) 6-4 6-4
Vondrousova M. (Cze) – Cristian J. (Rou) 6-3 6-1
Zarazua R. (Mex) – Putintseva Y. (Kaz) 3-6 6-4 6-2
Ito A. (Jpn) – Ruse G. (Rou) 6-2 7-6
Williams V. (Usa) – Bouzas Maneiro J. (Esp) 4-6 4-6
Pera B. (Usa) – Lys E. (Ger) 2-6 6-4 5-7
Danilovic O. (Srb) – Boulter K. (Gbr) 6-0 7-5
Osuigwe W. (Usa) – Maria T. (Ger) 2-6 3-6

Players BYE: Aryna Sabalenka, Emma Raducanu, Leylah Fernandez, Ludmilla Samsonova, Elena Rybakina, Elise Mertens, Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova, Madison Keys, Iga Swiatek, Marta Kostyuk, Magdalena Frech, Diana Shnaider, Ekaterina Alexandrova, Beatriz Haddad Maia, Anna Kalinskaya, Amanda Anisimova, Emma Navarro, Mccartney Kessler, Sofia Kenin, Karolina Muchova, Clara Tauson, Belinda Bencic, Magda Linette, Jessica Pegula, Jasmine Paolini, Ashlyn Krueger, Linda Noskova, Elina Svitolina, Daria Kasatkina, Dayana Yastremska, Jelena Ostapenko, and Coco Gauff.

Cincinnati 2025 Qualifications – Finals

Ruzic A. (Cro) – Hozumi E. (Jpn) 6-3 6-1
Bucsa C. (Esp) – Osuigwe W. (Usa) 3-6 3-6
Galfi D. (Hun) – Ito A. (Jpn) 3-6 4-6
Jovic I. (Usa) – Gracheva V. (Fra) 3-6 4-6
Yuan Y. (Chn) – Ngounoue C. (Usa) 6-3 4-6 3-6
Inglis M. (Aus) – Zakharova A. (Wrl) 4-6 6-2 6-2
Jeanjean L. (Fra) – Masarova R. (Sui) 6-3 6-4
Ruzic A. (Cro) – Arconada U. M. (Usa) 6-2 6-4
Osuigwe W. (Usa) – Sasnovich A. (Wrl) 7-6 6-4
Jacquemot E. (Fra) – Tomova V. (Bul) 4-6 1-6
Hon P. (Aus) – Seidel E. (Ger) 7-5 3-6 4-6
Sierra S. (Arg) – Bektas E. (Usa) 3-6 5-7

Cincinnati 2025 Qualifications – Semi-Finals

Buzarnescu M. (Rou) – Gracheva V. (Fra) 0-6 2-6
Ngounoue C. (Usa) – Gadecki O. (Aus) 6-7 6-3 6-3
Chirico L. (Usa) – Tomova V. (Bul) 2-6 1-6
Cocciaretto E. (Ita) – Hon P. (Aus) 4-6 4-6
Jacquemot E. (Fra) – Juvan K. (Slo) 2-6 7-5 7-5
Jovic I. (Usa) – Eikeri U. (Nor) 7-5 6-2
Seidel E. (Ger) – Lepchenko V. (Usa) 6-2 6-1
Rakhimova K. (Wrl) – Burrage J. (Gbr) 7-6 6-2
Siegemund L. (Ger) – Aiava D. (Aus) 6-1 6-1
Watson H. (Gbr) – Zakharova A. (Wrl) 2-6 3-6
Mandlik E. (Usa) – Marino R. (Can) 2-6 6-7
Sierra S. (Arg) – Trevisan M. (Ita) 6-3 6-4
Guo H. (Chn) – Todoni A. A. (Rou) 6-1 6-0
Parrizas-Diaz N. (Esp) – Inglis M. (Aus) 6-1 6-7 2-6
Bektas E. (Usa) – Kawa K. (Pol) 6-1 6-1
Bucsa C. (Esp) – Mateas M. (Usa) 6-1 6-1
Hozumi E. (Jpn) – Shibahara E. (Jpn) 6-4 4-6 6-2
Yuan Y. (Chn) – Sharma A. (Aus) 6-4 6-2
Krunic A. (Srb) – Ito A. (Jpn) 6-4 4-6 2-6
Galfi D. (Hun) – Hibino N. (Jpn) 2-6 6-3 6-3
Rakhimova K. (Wrl) – Marino R. (Can) 3-6 6-4 7-5
Siegemund L. (Ger) – Guo H. (Chn) 6-2 6-7 6-3
Davis L. (Usa) – Masarova (Sui) 2-6 4-6
Jeanjean L. (Fra) – Zhao C. (Can) 6-1 4-6 6-3