Five Key Storylines in WTA Rome Open
- In a surprising twist, former Top 10 mainstay Maria Sakkari was relegated to the qualifying draw in Rome, a rare sight for a player of her caliber. Following a string of inconsistent results and a significant drop in her ranking, Sakkari had to battle through the qualifiers just to enter the main draw. Her presence in the preliminaries created a buzz among fans and media, and added intensity to early-round matches usually reserved for lower-ranked players and rising stars. How far she can go — and whether this marks a turning point or a slide — is one of the tournament’s most compelling narratives. First she was progressing well. The Greek player advanced to the main draw and secured a first-round victory over Bencic, who was forced to retire midway through the match. But in the next round, Magda Linette proved too strong.
- Iga Swiatek, the world No. 2 and defending champion, arrived in Rome looking to win her third consecutive title at the Foro Italico. Any further stumbles would shake up the draw and raise questions for the Pole heading into Roland Garros. In Rome she had the chance to change the narrative. She could not. Danielle Collins defeated her in the first week.
- Fresh off a career-best season, Jasmine Paolini entered her home tournament with soaring expectations. Backed by raucous Italian fans, she carried the weight of national hopes on her shoulders. She cruised into the quarterfinals with a straight-sets victory over Elena Ostapenko. She then defeated Diana Shnaider in three sets and Peyton Stearns in two to reach the final.
- The teenage phenom Mirra Andreeva continues to stun the tour with maturity beyond her years. After an impressive showing in Madrid, Andreeva has brought that momentum to Rome, notching wins over seasoned players and showing nerves of steel in pressure situations. Her Round of 16 match had both Clara Tauson’s and Andreeva’s fans on their feet. It was a fierce battle, with both players fired up. In the end, the Russian prevailed. In the quarterfinals, Coco Gauff overwhelmed the young challenger, and went on to make it all the way to the final.
- Once considered part of the tour’s dominant “Big Three” alongside Swiatek and Sabalenka, Elena Rybakina has endured a disrupted and underwhelming 2025 season so far. Injuries, illnesses, and early exits have plagued her campaign, leading to questions about her form and fitness. Arriving in Rome without a single title this year — a stark contrast to her powerful spring run in 2023 — Rybakina is under pressure to rediscover her rhythm on clay. Rome may have represented her best chance to ignite a late-spring resurgence ahead of Roland Garros. But that opportunity slipped away — she fell to Bianca Andreescu in straight sets.
Madrid Open 2025 WTA Final
Played on Saturday, May 17, 2025.
Gauff vs Paolini – Match Stats
Stat | Gauff | Paolini |
---|---|---|
Dominance Ratio | 0.78 | 1.29 |
Serve Rating | 184 | 276 |
Aces | 1 | 0 |
Double Faults | 7 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 53% (31/58) | 76% (53/70) |
1st Serve Points Won | 52% (16/31) | 57% (30/53) |
2nd Serve Points Won | 41% (11/27) | 65% (11/17) |
Break Points Saved | 29% (2/7) | 60% (3/5) |
Service Games | 44% (4/9) | 78% (7/9) |
Ace % | 1.7% | 0% |
Double Fault % | 12.1% | 0% |
Return Rating | 140 | 234 |
1st Return Points Won | 43% (23/53) | 48% (15/31) |
2nd Return Points Won | 35% (6/17) | 59% (16/27) |
Break Points Won | 40% (2/5) | 71% (5/7) |
Return Games | 22% (2/9) | 56% (5/9) |
Pressure Points | 33% (4/12) | 67% (8/12) |
Service Points | 47% (27/58) | 59% (41/70) |
Return Points | 41% (29/70) | 53% (31/58) |
Total Points | 44% (56/128) | 56% (72/128) |
Match Points Saved | 1 | 0 |
Max Points In A Row | 5 | 5 |
Service Games Won | 44% (4/9) | 78% (7/9) |
Return Games Won | 22% (2/9) | 56% (5/9) |
Total Games | 33% (6/18) | 67% (12/18) |
Max Games In A Row | 1 | 4 |
Injury Timeouts | 0 | 0 |
Match Duration | 1h 30m |
Final Result: Jasmine Paolini defeats Cori Gauff 6-4, 6-2
Madrid Open 2025 Semi-Finals Results
Paolini vs Stearns – Match Stats
Stat | Paolini | Stearns |
---|---|---|
Dominance Ratio | 1.23 | 0.81 |
Serve Rating | 265 | 183 |
Aces | 1 | 0 |
Double Faults | 1 | 5 |
1st Serve % | 82% (58/71) | 55% (39/71) |
1st Serve Points Won | 60% (35/58) | 59% (23/39) |
2nd Serve Points Won | 45% (5/11) | 34% (11/32) |
Break Points Saved | 71% (5/7) | 45% (5/11) |
Service Games | 78% (7/9) | 40% (4/10) |
Ace % | 1.4% | 0% |
Double Fault % | 1.4% | 7% |
Return Rating | 222 | 146 |
1st Return Points Won | 41% (16/39) | 40% (23/58) |
2nd Return Points Won | 66% (21/32) | 55% (6/11) |
Break Points Won | 55% (6/11) | 29% (2/7) |
Return Games | 60% (6/10) | 22% (2/9) |
Pressure Points | 61% (11/18) | 39% (7/18) |
Service Points | 58% (41/71) | 48% (34/71) |
Return Points | 52% (37/71) | 42% (30/71) |
Total Points | 55% (78/142) | 45% (64/142) |
Match Points Saved | 0 | 0 |
Max Points In A Row | 6 | 5 |
Service Games Won | 78% (7/9) | 40% (4/10) |
Return Games Won | 60% (6/10) | 22% (2/9) |
Total Games | 68% (13/19) | 32% (6/19) |
Max Games In A Row | 6 | 3 |
Injury Timeouts | 0 | 0 |
Match Duration | 1h 41m |
Result: Jasmine Paolini (Ita) – Peyton Stearns (Usa) 7-5 6-1
Zheng vs Gauff – Match Stats
Stat | Zheng | Gauff |
---|---|---|
Dominance Ratio | 0.89 | 1.12 |
Serve Rating | 187 | 185 |
Aces | 1 | 2 |
Double Faults | 4 | 15 |
1st Serve % | 52% (58/112) | 59% (85/144) |
1st Serve Points Won | 52% (30/58) | 61% (52/85) |
2nd Serve Points Won | 39% (21/54) | 37% (22/59) |
Break Points Saved | 47% (8/17) | 63% (17/27) |
Service Games | 47% (8/17) | 41% (7/17) |
Ace % | 0.9% | 1.4% |
Double Fault % | 3.6% | 10.4% |
Return Rating | 198 | 215 |
1st Return Points Won | 39% (33/85) | 48% (28/58) |
2nd Return Points Won | 63% (37/59) | 61% (33/54) |
Break Points Won | 37% (10/27) | 53% (9/17) |
Return Games | 59% (10/17) | 53% (9/17) |
Pressure Points | 41% (18/44) | 59% (26/44) |
Service Points | 46% (51/112) | 51% (74/144) |
Return Points | 49% (70/144) | 54% (61/112) |
Total Points | 47% (121/256) | 53% (135/256) |
Match Points Saved | 0 | 0 |
Max Points In A Row | 7 | 8 |
Service Games Won | 47% (8/17) | 41% (7/17) |
Return Games Won | 59% (10/17) | 53% (9/17) |
Total Games | 53% (18/34) | 47% (16/34) |
Max Games In A Row | 3 | 3 |
Injury Timeouts | 0 | 0 |
Match Duration | 3h 34m |
Result: Qinwen Zheng (Chn) – Coco Gauff (Usa) 6-7 (3-7) 6-4 6-7 (4-7)
Madrid Open 2025 Quarter-Finals Results & Stats
Paolini vs Shnaider – Match Stats
Stat | Paolini | Shnaider |
---|---|---|
Dominance Ratio | 1.01 | 0.99 |
Serve Rating | 228 | 200 |
Aces | 1 | 2 |
Double Faults | 0 | 5 |
1st Serve % | 79% (71/90) | 64% (74/115) |
1st Serve Points Won | 56% (40/71) | 53% (39/74) |
2nd Serve Points Won | 32% (6/19) | 46% (19/41) |
Break Points Saved | 25% (2/8) | 53% (10/19) |
Service Games | 60% (9/15) | 40% (6/15) |
Ace % | 1.1% | 1.7% |
Double Fault % | 0% | 4.3% |
Return Rating | 208 | 227 |
1st Return Points Won | 47% (35/74) | 44% (31/71) |
2nd Return Points Won | 54% (22/41) | 68% (13/19) |
Break Points Won | 47% (9/19) | 75% (6/8) |
Return Games | 60% (9/15) | 40% (6/15) |
Pressure Points | 41% (11/27) | 59% (16/27) |
Service Points | 51% (46/90) | 50% (58/115) |
Return Points | 50% (57/115) | 49% (44/90) |
Total Points | 50% (103/205) | 50% (102/205) |
Match Points Saved | 0 | 0 |
Max Points In A Row | 6 | 9 |
Service Games Won | 60% (9/15) | 40% (6/15) |
Return Games Won | 60% (9/15) | 40% (6/15) |
Total Games | 60% (18/30) | 40% (12/30) |
Max Games In A Row | 6 | 6 |
Injury Timeouts | 0 | 0 |
Match Duration | 2h 25m |
Result: Paolini J. (Ita) – Shnaider D. (Wrl) 6-7 (1-7) 6-4 6-2
Stearns vs Svitolina – Match Stats
Stat | Stearns | Svitolina |
---|---|---|
Dominance Ratio | 1.08 | 0.92 |
Serve Rating | 211 | 203 |
Aces | 0 | 3 |
Double Faults | 8 | 4 |
1st Serve % | 68% (70/103) | 56% (53/95) |
1st Serve Points Won | 60% (42/70) | 53% (28/53) |
2nd Serve Points Won | 38% (13/34) | 48% (23/48) |
Break Points Saved | 59% (10/17) | 56% (10/18) |
Service Games | 53% (8/15) | 47% (7/15) |
Ace % | 0% | 3.2% |
Double Fault % | 7.8% | 4.2% |
Return Rating | 196 | 190 |
1st Return Points Won | 47% (25/53) | 40% (28/70) |
2nd Return Points Won | 52% (25/48) | 62% (21/34) |
Break Points Won | 44% (8/18) | 41% (7/17) |
Return Games | 53% (8/15) | 47% (7/15) |
Pressure Points | 51% (18/35) | 49% (17/35) |
Service Points | 53% (55/103) | 49% (47/95) |
Return Points | 51% (48/95) | 47% (48/103) |
Total Points | 52% (103/198) | 48% (95/198) |
Match Points Saved | 0 | 0 |
Max Points In A Row | 7 | 6 |
Service Games Won | 53% (8/15) | 47% (7/15) |
Return Games Won | 53% (8/15) | 47% (7/15) |
Total Games | 53% (16/30) | 47% (14/30) |
Max Games In A Row | 8 | 7 |
Injury Timeouts | 0 | 0 |
Match Duration | 2h 36m |
Result: Stearns P. (Usa) – Svitolina E. (Ukr) 6-2 4-6 7-6 (7-4)
Gauff vs Andreeva – Match Stats
Stat | Gauff | Andreeva |
---|---|---|
Dominance Ratio | 1.42 | 0.71 |
Serve Rating | 268 | 225 |
Aces | 2 | 0 |
Double Faults | 2 | 3 |
1st Serve % | 67% (41/61) | 56% (40/71) |
1st Serve Points Won | 73% (30/41) | 50% (20/40) |
2nd Serve Points Won | 55% (11/20) | 58% (18/31) |
Break Points Saved | 40% (2/5) | 43% (3/7) |
Service Games | 73% (8/11) | 64% (7/11) |
Ace % | 3.3% | 0% |
Double Fault % | 3.3% | 4.2% |
Return Rating | 185 | 159 |
1st Return Points Won | 50% (20/40) | 27% (11/41) |
2nd Return Points Won | 42% (13/31) | 45% (9/20) |
Break Points Won | 57% (4/7) | 60% (3/5) |
Return Games | 36% (4/11) | 27% (3/11) |
Pressure Points | 50% (6/12) | 50% (6/12) |
Service Points | 67% (41/61) | 54% (38/71) |
Return Points | 46% (33/71) | 33% (20/61) |
Total Points | 56% (74/132) | 44% (58/132) |
Match Points Saved | 0 | 0 |
Max Points In A Row | 6 | 4 |
Service Games Won | 73% (8/11) | 64% (7/11) |
Return Games Won | 36% (4/11) | 27% (3/11) |
Total Games | 55% (12/22) | 45% (10/22) |
Max Games In A Row | 3 | 3 |
Injury Timeouts | 0 | 0 |
Match Duration | 1h 45m |
Result: Gauff C. (Usa) – Andreeva M. (Wrl) 6-4 7-6
Sabalenka vs Zheng – Match Stats
Stat | Sabalenka | Zheng |
---|---|---|
Dominance Ratio | 0.72 | 1.39 |
Serve Rating | 243 | 289 |
Aces | 0 | 4 |
Double Faults | 1 | 3 |
1st Serve % | 65% (44/68) | 54% (34/63) |
1st Serve Points Won | 59% (26/44) | 82% (28/34) |
2nd Serve Points Won | 50% (12/24) | 52% (15/29) |
Break Points Saved | 70% (7/10) | 100% (4/4) |
Service Games | 70% (7/10) | 100% (9/9) |
Ace % | 0% | 6.3% |
Double Fault % | 1.5% | 4.8% |
Return Rating | 66 | 151 |
1st Return Points Won | 18% (6/34) | 41% (18/44) |
2nd Return Points Won | 48% (14/29) | 50% (12/24) |
Break Points Won | 0% (0/4) | 30% (3/10) |
Return Games | 0% (0/9) | 30% (3/10) |
Pressure Points | 50% (7/14) | 50% (7/14) |
Service Points | 56% (38/68) | 68% (43/63) |
Return Points | 32% (20/63) | 44% (30/68) |
Total Points | 44% (58/131) | 56% (73/131) |
Match Points Saved | 1 | 0 |
Max Points In A Row | 4 | 7 |
Service Games Won | 70% (7/10) | 100% (9/9) |
Return Games Won | 0% (0/9) | 30% (3/10) |
Total Games | 37% (7/19) | 63% (12/19) |
Max Games In A Row | 1 | 3 |
Injury Timeouts | 0 | 0 |
Match Duration | 1h 38m |
Result: Sabalenka A. (Wrl) – Zheng Q. (Chn) 4-6 3-6
Rome Open 2025 Round of 16 Results (May 12, 2025)
Stearns vs Osaka – Match Stats
Stat | Stearns | Osaka |
---|---|---|
Dominance Ratio | 0.81 | 1.23 |
Serve Rating | 263 | 290 |
Aces | 6 | 10 |
Double Faults | 3 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 60% (63/105) | 65% (56/86) |
1st Serve Points Won | 75% (47/63) | 77% (43/56) |
2nd Serve Points Won | 45% (19/42) | 57% (17/30) |
Break Points Saved | 70% (7/10) | 0% (0/3) |
Service Games | 80% (12/15) | 81% (13/16) |
Ace % | 5.7% | 11.6% |
Double Fault % | 2.9% | 0% |
Return Rating | 185 | 130 |
1st Return Points Won | 23% (13/56) | 25% (16/63) |
2nd Return Points Won | 43% (13/30) | 55% (23/42) |
Break Points Won | 100% (3/3) | 30% (3/10) |
Return Games | 19% (3/16) | 20% (3/15) |
Pressure Points | 77% (10/13) | 23% (3/13) |
Service Points | 63% (66/105) | 70% (60/86) |
Return Points | 30% (26/86) | 37% (39/105) |
Total Points | 48% (92/191) | 52% (99/191) |
Match Points Saved | 0 | 0 |
Max Points In A Row | 6 | 7 |
Service Games Won | 80% (12/15) | 81% (13/16) |
Return Games Won | 19% (3/16) | 20% (3/15) |
Total Games | 48% (15/31) | 52% (16/31) |
Max Games In A Row | 4 | 5 |
Injury Timeouts | 0 | 0 |
Match Duration | 2h 43m |
Result: Stearns P. (Usa) – Osaka N. (Jpn) 6-4 3-6 7-6
Paolini vs Ostapenko – Match Stats
Stat | Paolini | Ostapenko |
---|---|---|
Dominance Ratio | 1.16 | 0.86 |
Serve Rating | 297 | 222 |
Aces | 5 | 5 |
Double Faults | 1 | 7 |
1st Serve % | 72% (53/74) | 56% (44/79) |
1st Serve Points Won | 55% (29/53) | 59% (26/44) |
2nd Serve Points Won | 76% (16/21) | 49% (17/35) |
Break Points Saved | 83% (5/6) | 43% (3/7) |
Service Games | 90% (9/10) | 60% (6/10) |
Ace % | 6.8% | 6.3% |
Double Fault % | 1.4% | 8.9% |
Return Rating | 189 | 96 |
1st Return Points Won | 41% (18/44) | 45% (24/53) |
2nd Return Points Won | 51% (18/35) | 24% (5/21) |
Break Points Won | 57% (4/7) | 17% (1/6) |
Return Games | 40% (4/10) | 10% (1/10) |
Pressure Points | 69% (9/13) | 31% (4/13) |
Service Points | 61% (45/74) | 54% (43/79) |
Return Points | 46% (36/79) | 39% (29/74) |
Total Points | 53% (81/153) | 47% (72/153) |
Match Points Saved | 0 | 0 |
Max Points In A Row | 6 | 4 |
Service Games Won | 90% (9/10) | 60% (6/10) |
Return Games Won | 40% (4/10) | 10% (1/10) |
Total Games | 65% (13/20) | 35% (7/20) |
Max Games In A Row | 5 | 3 |
Injury Timeouts | 0 | 0 |
Match Duration | 1h 46m |
Result: Paolini J. (Ita) – Ostapenko J. (Lat) 7-5 6-2
Shnaider vs Mertens – Match Stats
Stat | Shnaider | Mertens |
---|---|---|
Dominance Ratio | 1.33 | 0.75 |
Serve Rating | 300 | 226 |
Aces | 1 | 2 |
Double Faults | 1 | 5 |
1st Serve % | 68% (43/63) | 60% (27/45) |
1st Serve Points Won | 72% (31/43) | 78% (21/27) |
2nd Serve Points Won | 60% (12/20) | 28% (5/18) |
Break Points Saved | 100% (5/5) | 50% (3/6) |
Service Games | 100% (9/9) | 63% (5/8) |
Ace % | 1.6% | 4.4% |
Double Fault % | 1.6% | 11.1% |
Return Rating | 182 | 68 |
1st Return Points Won | 22% (6/27) | 28% (12/43) |
2nd Return Points Won | 72% (13/18) | 40% (8/20) |
Break Points Won | 50% (3/6) | 0% (0/5) |
Return Games | 38% (3/8) | 0% (0/9) |
Pressure Points | 73% (8/11) | 27% (3/11) |
Service Points | 68% (43/63) | 58% (26/45) |
Return Points | 42% (19/45) | 32% (20/63) |
Total Points | 57% (62/108) | 43% (46/108) |
Match Points Saved | 0 | 0 |
Max Points In A Row | 6 | 6 |
Service Games Won | 100% (9/9) | 63% (5/8) |
Return Games Won | 38% (3/8) | 0% (0/9) |
Total Games | 71% (12/17) | 29% (5/17) |
Max Games In A Row | 5 | 1 |
Injury Timeouts | 0 | 0 |
Match Duration | 1h 17m |
Result: Shnaider D. (Wrl) – Mertens E. (Bel) 6-2 6-3
Svitolina vs Collins – Match Stats
Stat | Svitolina | Collins |
---|---|---|
Dominance Ratio | 1.34 | 0.75 |
Serve Rating | 247 | 190 |
Aces | 3 | 0 |
Double Faults | 5 | 6 |
1st Serve % | 55% (31/56) | 64% (39/61) |
1st Serve Points Won | 71% (22/31) | 56% (22/39) |
2nd Serve Points Won | 45% (13/29) | 32% (7/22) |
Break Points Saved | 67% (4/6) | 58% (7/12) |
Service Games | 78% (7/9) | 44% (4/9) |
Ace % | 5.4% | 0% |
Double Fault % | 8.9% | 9.8% |
Return Rating | 210 | 139 |
1st Return Points Won | 44% (17/39) | 29% (9/31) |
2nd Return Points Won | 68% (15/22) | 55% (16/29) |
Break Points Won | 42% (5/12) | 33% (2/6) |
Return Games | 56% (5/9) | 22% (2/9) |
Pressure Points | 50% (9/18) | 50% (9/18) |
Service Points | 61% (34/56) | 48% (29/61) |
Return Points | 52% (32/61) | 39% (22/56) |
Total Points | 56% (66/117) | 44% (51/117) |
Match Points Saved | 0 | 3 |
Max Points In A Row | 8 | 5 |
Service Games Won | 78% (7/9) | 44% (4/9) |
Return Games Won | 56% (5/9) | 22% (2/9) |
Total Games | 67% (12/18) | 33% (6/18) |
Max Games In A Row | 6 | 2 |
Injury Timeouts | 0 | 0 |
Match Duration | 1h 27m |
Result: Svitolina E. (Ukr) – Collins D. (Usa) 6-4 6-2
Gauff vs Raducanu – Match Stats
Stat | Gauff | Raducanu |
---|---|---|
Dominance Ratio | 1.60 | 0.62 |
Serve Rating | 290 | 198 |
Aces | 4 | 0 |
Double Faults | 3 | 1 |
1st Serve % | 63% (37/59) | 65% (30/46) |
1st Serve Points Won | 76% (28/37) | 47% (14/30) |
2nd Serve Points Won | 50% (11/22) | 44% (7/16) |
Break Points Saved | 100% (3/3) | 56% (5/9) |
Service Games | 100% (8/8) | 43% (3/7) |
Ace % | 6.8% | 0% |
Double Fault % | 5.1% | 2.2% |
Return Rating | 210 | 74 |
1st Return Points Won | 53% (16/30) | 24% (9/37) |
2nd Return Points Won | 55% (10/18) | 50% (11/22) |
Break Points Won | 44% (4/9) | 0% (0/3) |
Return Games | 57% (4/7) | 0% (0/8) |
Pressure Points | 58% (7/12) | 42% (5/12) |
Service Points | 66% (44/67) | 50% (23/46) |
Return Points | 54% (25/46) | 34% (20/59) |
Total Points | 61% (84/105) | 39% (41/105) |
Match Points Saved | 0 | 1 |
Max Points In A Row | 5 | 4 |
Service Games Won | 100% (8/8) | 43% (3/7) |
Return Games Won | 57% (4/7) | 0% (0/8) |
Total Games | 80% (12/15) | 20% (3/15) |
Max Games In A Row | 5 | 1 |
Injury Timeouts | 0 | 0 |
Match Duration | 1h 21m |
Result: Gauff C. (Usa) – Raducanu E. (Gbr) 6-1 6-2
Tauson vs Andreeva – Match Stats
Stat | Tauson | Andreeva |
---|---|---|
Dominance Ratio | 0.82 | 1.22 |
Serve Rating | 236 | 273 |
Aces | 2 | 2 |
Double Faults | 4 | 4 |
1st Serve % | 61% (58/95) | 66% (67/101) |
1st Serve Points Won | 66% (38/58) | 73% (49/67) |
2nd Serve Points Won | 44% (16/36) | 50% (17/34) |
Break Points Saved | 29% (2/7) | 80% (8/10) |
Service Games | 67% (10/15) | 86% (12/14) |
Ace % | 2.1% | 2% |
Double Fault % | 4.2% | 4% |
Return Rating | 111 | 194 |
1st Return Points Won | 27% (18/67) | 34% (20/58) |
2nd Return Points Won | 50% (17/34) | 56% (20/36) |
Break Points Won | 20% (2/10) | 71% (5/7) |
Return Games | 14% (2/14) | 33% (5/15) |
Pressure Points | 24% (4/17) | 76% (13/17) |
Service Points | 58% (55/95) | 65% (66/101) |
Return Points | 35% (35/101) | 42% (40/95) |
Total Points | 46% (90/196) | 54% (106/196) |
Match Points Saved | 0 | 0 |
Max Points In A Row | 4 | 8 |
Service Games Won | 67% (10/15) | 86% (12/14) |
Return Games Won | 14% (2/14) | 33% (5/15) |
Total Games | 41% (12/29) | 59% (17/29) |
Max Games In A Row | 3 | 3 |
Injury Timeouts | 0 | 0 |
Match Duration | 2h 36m |
Result: Tauson C. (Den) – Andreeva M. (Wrl) 7-5 3-6 2-6
Andreescu vs Zheng – Match Stats
Stat | Andreescu | Zheng |
---|---|---|
Dominance Ratio | 0.71 | 1.41 |
Serve Rating | 179 | 217 |
Aces | 0 | 1 |
Double Faults | 0 | 9 |
1st Serve % | 73% (43/59) | 46% (26/57) |
1st Serve Points Won | 40% (17/43) | 77% (20/26) |
2nd Serve Points Won | 44% (7/16) | 42% (13/31) |
Break Points Saved | 53% (8/15) | 33% (2/6) |
Service Games | 22% (2/9) | 60% (6/10) |
Ace % | 0% | 1.8% |
Double Fault % | 0% | 15.8% |
Return Rating | 188 | 241 |
1st Return Points Won | 23% (6/26) | 60% (26/43) |
2nd Return Points Won | 58% (18/31) | 56% (9/16) |
Break Points Won | 67% (4/6) | 47% (7/15) |
Return Games | 40% (4/10) | 78% (7/9) |
Pressure Points | 57% (12/21) | 43% (9/21) |
Service Points | 41% (24/59) | 58% (33/57) |
Return Points | 42% (24/57) | 59% (35/59) |
Total Points | 41% (48/116) | 59% (68/116) |
Match Points Saved | 1 | 0 |
Max Points In A Row | 7 | 6 |
Service Games Won | 22% (2/9) | 60% (6/10) |
Return Games Won | 40% (4/10) | 78% (7/9) |
Total Games | 32% (6/19) | 68% (13/19) |
Max Games In A Row | 3 | 7 |
Injury Timeouts | 0 | 0 |
Match Duration | 1h 35m |
Result: Andreescu B. (Can) – Zheng Q. (Chn) 5-7 1-6
Sabalenka vs Kostyuk – Match Stats
Stat | Sabalenka | Kostyuk |
---|---|---|
Dominance Ratio | 1.19 | 0.84 |
Serve Rating | 257 | 213 |
Aces | 4 | 2 |
Double Faults | 2 | 5 |
1st Serve % | 56% (51/91) | 60% (50/83) |
1st Serve Points Won | 71% (36/51) | 64% (32/50) |
2nd Serve Points Won | 48% (19/40) | 36% (12/33) |
Break Points Saved | 86% (12/14) | 60% (6/10) |
Service Games | 80% (8/10) | 56% (5/9) |
Ace % | 4.4% | 2.4% |
Double Fault % | 2.2% | 6% |
Return Rating | 184 | 116 |
1st Return Points Won | 36% (18/50) | 29% (15/51) |
2nd Return Points Won | 64% (21/33) | 53% (21/40) |
Break Points Won | 40% (4/10) | 14% (2/14) |
Return Games | 44% (4/9) | 20% (2/10) |
Pressure Points | 67% (16/24) | 33% (8/24) |
Service Points | 60% (55/91) | 53% (44/83) |
Return Points | 47% (39/83) | 40% (36/91) |
Total Points | 54% (94/174) | 46% (80/174) |
Match Points Saved | 0 | 2 |
Max Points In A Row | 7 | 5 |
Service Games Won | 80% (8/10) | 56% (5/9) |
Return Games Won | 44% (4/9) | 20% (2/10) |
Total Games | 63% (12/19) | 37% (7/19) |
Max Games In A Row | 3 | 2 |
Injury Timeouts | 0 | 0 |
Match Duration | 2h 06m |
Result: Sabalenka A. (Wrl) – Kostyuk M. (Ukr) 6-1 7-6
Rome Open 2025 Round of 32 Results (May 10-11, 2025)
Fernandez L. (Can) – Kostyuk M. (Ukr) 4-6 2-6
Frech M. (Pol) – Zheng Q. (Chn) 3-6 2-6
Gauff C. (Usa) – Linette M. (Pol) 7-5 6-3
Navarro E. (Usa) – Tauson C. (Den) 6-3 0-6 4-6
Noskova vs Andreeva – Match Stats
Stat | Noskova | Andreeva |
---|---|---|
Dominance Ratio | 0.72 | 1.38 |
Serve Rating | 202 | 272 |
Aces | 2 | 2 |
Double Faults | 6 | 1 |
1st Serve % | 60% (17/28) | 69% (36/52) |
1st Serve Points Won | 88% (15/17) | 72% (26/36) |
2nd Serve Points Won | 36% (4/11) | 69% (11/16) |
Break Points Saved | 38% (3/8) | 80% (4/5) |
Service Games | 50% (5/10) | 89% (8/9) |
Ace % | 3.2% | 3.3% |
Double Fault % | 9.7% | 1.6% |
Return Rating | 105 | 217 |
1st Return Points Won | 28% (10/36) | 32% (10/31) |
2nd Return Points Won | 41% (7/17) | 72% (13/18) |
Break Points Won | 20% (1/5) | 63% (5/8) |
Return Games | 11% (1/9) | 50% (5/10) |
Pressure Points | 31% (4/13) | 69% (9/13) |
Service Points | 52% (19/36) | 73% (37/51) |
Return Points | 35% (17/49) | 48% (24/50) |
Total Points | 43% (36/85) | 57% (49/87) |
Match Points Saved | 0 | 0 |
Max Points In A Row | 4 | 6 |
Service Games Won | 50% (5/10) | 89% (8/9) |
Return Games Won | 11% (1/9) | 50% (5/10) |
Total Games | 35% (6/17) | 65% (11/17) |
Max Games In A Row | 3 | 7 |
Injury Timeouts | 0 | 0 |
Match Duration | 1h 24m |
Result: Noskova L. (Cze) – Andreeva M. (Wrl) 1-6 5-7
Raducanu E. (Gbr) – Kudermetova V. (Wrl) 5-7 6-0 6-1
Rybakina vs Andreescu – Match Stats
Stat | Rybakina | Andreescu |
---|---|---|
Dominance Ratio | 0.67 | 1.49 |
Serve Rating | 217 | 232 |
Aces | 1 | 1 |
Double Faults | 3 | 2 |
1st Serve % | 44% (26/57) | 85% (96/113) |
1st Serve Points Won | 58% (15/26) | 68% (65/96) |
2nd Serve Points Won | 54% (17/31) | 65% (11/17) |
Break Points Saved | 50% (3/6) | 100% (5/5) |
Service Games | 67% (6/9) | 100% (9/9) |
Ace % | 1.8% | 1.5% |
Double Fault % | 5.3% | 0.9% |
Return Rating | 57 | 177 |
1st Return Points Won | 32% (18/56) | 42% (7/17) |
2nd Return Points Won | 52% (21/40) | 39% (12/31) |
Break Points Won | 0% (0/5) | 50% (3/6) |
Return Games | 0% (0/9) | 33% (3/9) |
Pressure Points | 27% (3/11) | 73% (8/11) |
Service Points | 54% (30/57) | 67% (76/113) |
Return Points | 32% (21/66) | 47% (27/57) |
Total Points | 41% (51/123) | 59% (72/123) |
Match Points Saved | 0 | 0 |
Max Points In A Row | 4 | 5 |
Service Games Won | 67% (6/9) | 100% (9/9) |
Return Games Won | 0% (0/9) | 33% (3/9) |
Total Games Won | 33% (6/18) | 67% (12/18) |
Max Games In A Row | 1 | 3 |
Injury Timeouts | 0 | 0 |
Match Duration | 1h 28m |
Result Rybakina E. (Kaz) – Andreescu B. (Can) 2-6 4-6
Sabalenka vs Kenin – Match Stats
Stat | Sabalenka | Kenin |
---|---|---|
Dominance Ratio | 1.18 | 0.85 |
Serve Rating | 236 | 193 |
Aces | 5 | 1 |
Double Faults | 4 | 4 |
1st Serve % | 62% (44/71) | 63% (79/124) |
1st Serve Points Won | 59% (26/44) | 56% (45/79) |
2nd Serve Points Won | 52% (14/27) | 45% (20/45) |
Break Points Saved | 38% (3/8) | 70% (16/23) |
Service Games | 62% (8/13) | 46% (6/13) |
Ace % | 7% | 0.8% |
Double Fault % | 5.6% | 6.5% |
Return Rating | 193 | 190 |
1st Return Points Won | 42% (33/78) | 41% (18/44) |
2nd Return Points Won | 67% (28/42) | 48% (13/27) |
Break Points Won | 30% (7/23) | 64% (9/14) |
Return Games | 54% (7/13) | 38% (5/13) |
Pressure Points | 32% (10/31) | 68% (21/31) |
Service Points | 56% (40/71) | 52% (65/124) |
Return Points | 52% (64/124) | 44% (31/71) |
Total Points | 53% (104/195) | 47% (91/195) |
Match Points Saved | 0 | 0 |
Max Points In A Row | 5 | 4 |
Service Games Won | 62% (8/13) | 46% (6/13) |
Return Games Won | 54% (7/13) | 38% (5/13) |
Total Games | 58% (15/26) | 42% (11/26) |
Max Games In A Row | 4 | 3 |
Injury Timeouts | 0 | 0 |
Match Duration | 2h 09m |
Result: Sabalenka A. (Wrl) – Kenin S. (Usa)3-6 6-3 6-3
Keys M. (Usa) – Stearns P. (Usa) 6-2 2-6 6-7
Shnaider D. (Wrl) – Cristian J. (Rou) 6-3 6-3
Collins D. (Usa) – Swiatek I. (Pol) 6-1 7-5
Svitolina E. (Ukr) – Baptiste H. (Usa) 6-4 3-6 6-4
Paolini J. (Ita) – Jabeur O. (Tun) 6-4 6-3
Bouzkova M. (Cze) – Osaka N. (Jpn) 6-4 3-6 3-6
Ostapenko J. (Lat) Walkover – Siegemund L. (Ger)
Mertens E. (Bel) – Pegula J. (Usa) 7-5 6-1
Rome Open 2025 Round of 64 Results (May 8-9, 2025)
Osaka N. (Jpn) – Badosa P. (Esp) Withdrawn
Osaka N. (Jpn) – Golubic V. (Sui) 2-6 7-5 6-1
Cristian J. (Rou) – Putintseva Y. (Kaz) 7-6 7-5
Kvitova P. (Cze) Withdrawn – Jabeur O. (Tun) WO
Shnaider D. (Wrl) – Dolehide C. (Usa) 6-0 6-0
Ostapenko J. (Lat) – Sramkova R. (Svk) 1-6 6-4 6-3
Mertens E. (Bel) – Lamens S. (Ned) 3-6 6-2 6-3
Stearns P. (Usa) – Kalinskaya A. (Wrl) 6-2 6-3
Cocciaretto vs Swiatek – Match Stats
Stat | Cocciaretto | Swiatek |
---|---|---|
Dominance Ratio | 0.31 | 3.19 |
SERVICE | ||
Serve Rating | 157 | 321 |
Aces | 2 | 3 |
Double Faults | 3 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 52% (25/48) | 68% (17/25) |
1st Serve Points Won | 36% (9/25) | 81% (17/21) |
2nd Serve Points Won | 36% (8/22) | 79% (11/14) |
Break Points Saved | 17% (1/6) | – (0/0) |
Service Games | 17% (1/6) | 100% (7/7) |
SERVE FREQ. | ||
Ace % | 5.6% | 2.9% |
Double Fault % | 8.3% | 0% |
RETURN | ||
Return Rating | 40 | 294 |
1st Return Points Won | 19% (4/21) | 64% (16/25) |
2nd Return Points Won | 21% (3/14) | 64% (9/14) |
Break Points Won | 0% (0/0) | 83% (5/6) |
Return Games | 0% (0/7) | 83% (5/6) |
POINTS WON | ||
Pressure Points | 17% (1/6) | 83% (5/6) |
Service Points | 36% (13/36) | 80% (28/35) |
Return Points | 20% (7/35) | 64% (23/36) |
Total Points | 28% (20/71) | 72% (51/71) |
Match Points Saved | 1 | 0 |
Max Points In A Row | 4 | 7 |
GAMES WON | ||
Service Games | 17% (1/6) | 100% (7/7) |
Return Games | 0% (0/7) | 83% (5/6) |
Total Games | 8% (1/13) | 92% (12/13) |
Max Games In A Row | 1 | 7 |
INJURIES | ||
Injury Timeouts | 0 | 0 |
OTHER | ||
Match Duration | 0h 54m |
Result: Cocciaretto E. (Ita) – Swiatek I. (Pol) 1-6 0-6
Paolini J. (Ita) – Sun L. (Nzl) 6-4 6-3
Collins D. (Usa) – Ruse G. (Rou) 6-3 6-3
Baptiste H. (Usa) – Samsonova L. (Wrl) 6-3 2-6 6-4
Krueger A. (Usa) – Pegula J. (Usa) 4-6 2-6
Svitolina E. (Ukr) – Bouzas Maneiro J. (Esp) 6-4 7-6
Keys M. (Usa) – Gracheva V. (Fra) 7-6 6-1
Haddad Maia B. (Bra) – Bouzkova M. (Cze) 0-6 3-6
CANCELLED Bronzetti L. (Ita) – Muchova K. (Cze)
Bronzetti L. (Ita) – Siegemund L. (Ger) 2-6 2-6
Pavlyuchenkova A. (Wrl) – Kenin S. (Usa) 3-6 0-6
Sabalenka vs Potapova – Match Stats
Stat | Sabalenka | Potapova |
---|---|---|
Dominance Ratio | 1.85 | 0.54 |
SERVE | ||
Serve Rating | 319 | 211 |
Aces | 0 | 1 |
Double Faults | 2 | 5 |
1st Serve % | 70% (30/43) | 59% (30/51) |
1st Serve Points Won | 80% (24/30) | 60% (18/30) |
2nd Serve Points Won | 69% (9/13) | 46% (10/21) |
Break Points Saved | 0% (0/0) | 33% (2/6) |
Service Games | 100% (4/4) | 50% (4/8) |
SERVE FREQ. | ||
Ace % | 0% | 2.1% |
Double Fault % | 0.1% | 2.4% |
RETURN | ||
Return Rating | 211 | 51 |
1st Return Points Won | 40% (12/30) | 20% (6/30) |
2nd Return Points Won | 54% (7/13) | 47% (4/13) |
Break Points Won | 67% (4/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Games | 50% (4/8) | 0% (0/4) |
POINTS WON | ||
Pressure Points | 67% (4/6) | 33% (2/6) |
Service Points | 77% (33/43) | 52% (28/51) |
Return Points | 43% (22/51) | 21% (9/43) |
Total Points | 59% (55/94) | 41% (39/94) |
Match Points Saved | 0 | 0 |
Max Points In A Row | 7 | 5 |
GAMES WON | ||
Service Games | 100% (4/4) | 50% (4/8) |
Return Games | 50% (4/8) | 0% (0/4) |
Total Games | 75% (8/12) | 25% (4/12) |
Max Games In A Row | 5 | 1 |
INJURIES | ||
Injury Timeouts | 0 | 0 |
OTHER | ||
Match Duration | 1h 05m |
Result: Sabalenka A. (Wrl) – Potapova A. (Wrl) 6-2 6-2
Sakkari M. (Gre) – Linette M. (Pol) 6-1 4-6 1-6
Frech M. (Pol) – Azarenka V. (Wrl) 7-5 6-4
Noskova L. (Cze) – Kartal S. (Gbr) 6-4 6-2
Volynets K. (Usa) Retired – Tauson C. (Den) 5-7 1-4
Danilovic O. (Srb) – Zheng Q. (Chn) 1-6 4-6
CANCELLED Alexandrova E. (Wrl) – Raducanu E. (Gbr)
Teichmann (Sui) – Raducanu E. (Gbr) 2-6 2-6
Kudermetova vs Anisimova – Match Stats
Stat | Kudermetova | Anisimova |
---|---|---|
Dominance Ratio | 1.10 | 0.91 |
SERVICE | ||
Serve Rating | 209 | 181 |
Aces | 5 | 2 |
Double Faults | 8 | 5 |
1st Serve % | 57% (64/84) | 55% (57/104) |
1st Serve Points Won | 54% (35/64) | 54% (31/57) |
2nd Serve Points Won | 57% (11/20) | 48% (22/47) |
Break Points Saved | 57% (8/14) | 62% (13/21) |
Service Games | 50% (6/12) | 42% (5/12) |
SERVE FREQ. | ||
Ace % | 6.2% | 1.9% |
Double Fault % | 7.4% | 10.6% |
RETURN | ||
Return Rating | 197 | 190 |
1st Return Points Won | 46% (26/57) | 46% (29/64) |
2nd Return Points Won | 61% (28/46) | 51% (13/20) |
Break Points Won | 32% (8/25) | 43% (9/21) |
Return Games | 58% (7/12) | 50% (6/12) |
POINTS WON | ||
Pressure Points | 42% (14/33) | 36% (19/53) |
Service Points | 52% (46/88) | 47% (49/104) |
Return Points | 53% (55/104) | 48% (39/81) |
Total Points | 52% (97/188) | 48% (88/185) |
Match Points Saved | 0 | 1 |
Max Points In A Row | 9 | 6 |
GAMES WON | ||
Service Games | 50% (6/12) | 42% (5/12) |
Return Games | 58% (7/12) | 50% (6/12) |
Total Games | 54% (13/24) | 46% (11/24) |
Max Games In A Row | 4 | 3 |
INJURIES | ||
Injury Timeouts | 0 | 0 |
OTHER | ||
Match Duration | 2h 27m |
Result: Kudermetova V. (Wrl) – Anisimova A. (Usa) 7-6 7-5
Arango E. (Col) – Andreeva M. (Wrl) 2-6 4-6
Fernandez L. (Can) – Ruzic A. (Cro) 6-4 6-0
Kostyuk M. (Ukr) – Kasatkina D. (Aus) 6-4 6-2
Navarro E. (Usa) – Rakhimova K. (Wrl) 6-1 6-3
Andreescu B. (Can) – Vekic D. (Cro) 6-1 3-6 6-2
Rybakina E. (Kaz) – Lys E. (Ger) 7-6 6-2
Gauff vs Mboko – Match Stats
Stat | Gauff | Mboko |
---|---|---|
Dominance Ratio | 1.31 | 0.77 |
SERVICE | ||
Serve Rating | 208 | 152 |
Aces | 2 | 2 |
Double Faults | 8 | 4 |
1st Serve % | 64% (46/72) | 64% (27/42) |
1st Serve Points Won | 54% (25/46) | 41% (11/27) |
2nd Serve Points Won | 78% (20/26) | 54% (8/15) |
Break Points Saved | 14% (1/7) | 31% (4/13) |
Service Games | 50% (6/12) | 25% (3/12) |
SERVE FREQ. | ||
Ace % | 2.8% | 2.7% |
Double Fault % | 11.1% | 8.1% |
RETURN | ||
Return Rating | 277 | 236 |
1st Return Points Won | 55% (24/44) | 46% (21/46) |
2nd Return Points Won | 78% (21/27) | 54% (14/26) |
Break Points Won | 69% (9/13) | 50% (3/6) |
Return Games | 75% (9/12) | 50% (6/12) |
POINTS WON | ||
Pressure Points | 50% (10/20) | 50% (10/20) |
Service Points | 57% (57/72) | 45% (29/64) |
Return Points | 64% (47/74) | 40% (29/72) |
Total Points | 58% (84/146) | 42% (62/146) |
Match Points Saved | 0 | 0 |
Max Points In A Row | 9 | 6 |
GAMES WON | ||
Service Games | 50% (6/12) | 25% (3/12) |
Return Games | Result: Gauff C. (Usa) – Mboko V. (Can) 3-6 6-2 6-1