For much of 2025, Paula Badosa’s tennis looked ready for the Top 5 again. Her body, stubborn as ever, did not get the memo. This was a year that began with a Grand Slam semifinal in Melbourne and ended with yet another retirement in Beijing, a season written in bold strokes and then repeatedly smudged by physical interruptions.
She started the year at No.12, briefly reminded the tour what her peak looks like, and closed it around No.18 — back in the Top 20, but still some distance from the player who once looked ready to camp there for a decade.
Melbourne: The Run That Proved She’s Still Dangerous
Adelaide, her opening tournament, offered a preview of the whole year in two matches. She scrapped past Peyton Stearns in three, then lost an attritional three-setter to Ashlyn Krueger, the DR a perfect 1.00 — a coin flip that landed the wrong way.
At the Australian Open, the margins widened decisively in her favour. She beat Wang Xinyu in straight sets, then bulldozed wildcard Talia Gibson 6-1, 6-0 with a monster dominance ratio of 2.78. Against Marta Kostyuk in the third round she showed her trademark stubbornness, navigating a tight three-setter with just enough first-strike clarity when the rallies mattered.
Olga Danilovic was brushed aside 6-1, 7-6, and then came the signature win: a 7-5, 6-4 straight-sets victory over world No.3 Coco Gauff in the quarterfinals, built on heavy baseline pressure and an excellent DR of 1.21.
Aryna Sabalenka stopped her 6-4, 6-2 in the semis, the world No.1 simply overpowering her in the big patterns. But Melbourne answered the only real question hanging over Badosa: could she still play a full, brutal, second-week Slam? The tennis said emphatically yes.
Gulf Swing: From Statement Tennis to Warning Signs
Abu Dhabi cut some of that momentum short. As the No.2 seed she took the court with authority, but Linda Noskova beat her 6-4, 6-1 in a match where the numbers showed a clear drop — DR down at 0.69, errors rising as the rallies lengthened.
Doha was more mixed. She edged Renata Zarazua in three, then lost 6-4, 6-3 to Anisimova, never quite imposing herself on the baseline exchanges. It was competent tennis, but a step down from the sharpness of Melbourne.
Then came Dubai and a reminder of her ceiling. She crushed Lulu Sun 6-3, 6-4, then dismantled Elise Mertens 6-2, 6-1 with a dominance ratio above 2.3. Against Elena Rybakina in the last sixteen she went toe to toe, losing 4-6, 7-6(8), 7-6(2) in a marathon decided by a handful of points. The DR was dead even at 1.00 — it felt like the sort of match that would have swung her way in her 2021 heyday.
Instead, it became the first of several near-misses that defined her year.
Merida and Miami: The Body Starts Talking Again
Merida looked, at first, like a simple ranking week. She ripped through Jaqueline Cristian 6-2, 6-1 with a brutal DR of 2.40, only to retire against Daria Saville in the quarterfinals at 1-6, 5-3. The numbers had been in her favour even there; the scoreboard and her body disagreed.
Miami told a similar story. She fought through a tricky opener against Victoria Mboko — 7-5, 1-6, 7-6(3) — a weird, lopsided match where the stats still tipped her way. She then handled Clara Tauson in straight sets and looked settled for a proper deep run.
And then she withdrew before her round-of-16 match against Alexandra Eala. Another blank space in a draw where her tennis had earned her the right to keep playing.
Clay: Flashes of the Old Badosa, But No Real Run
Strasbourg offered a short, sharp clay tune-up. She advanced past Bouzkova via retirement before losing a three-set battle to Liudmila Samsonova, the DR sitting just under parity.
At Roland Garros she opened with a quality win: recovering from a set down to beat Naomi Osaka 6-7, 6-1, 6-4, a match where her fitness and clay IQ proved decisive and the DR (1.29) told of a player firmly in charge after the first set. She then edged Ruse in three, again taking control late.
Against Daria Kasatkina, though, the wheels slipped. A 6-1, 7-5 defeat in the third round where the DR sagged to 0.73 underscored an uncomfortable truth: on clay, against elite defenders, her margin for error still felt thin.
It wasn’t a bad clay season, but for a former Roland Garros dark horse, it was undeniably underwhelming.
Grass: Berlin Spark, Wimbledon Shock
Berlin briefly suggested something more exciting. She blew through Eva Lys 6-1, 6-3 with a DR just under 1.9, then played one of her cleanest matches of the year to beat Emma Navarro 7-6, 6-3 — a serious grass-court scalp over a Top-10 opponent.
The quarterfinal against Wang Xinyu ended almost as soon as it began: 6-1, 0-0, retirement. Another mid-tournament stop sign.
At Wimbledon, the damage showed. As the No.9 seed she lost in the first round to Katie Boulter, 6-2, 3-6, 6-4. The DR sat at 0.84 — competitive but clearly second-best for long stretches. For a player whose power and movement should translate well on grass, it was one of the year’s most disappointing scorelines.
Late Season: More Effort Than Reward
Post-Wimbledon, the schedule thinned and the returns diminished.
The Billie Jean King Cup Finals brought a three-set loss to Svitolina, one of those grinding, attritional matches Badosa usually prides herself on edging.
Beijing gave her one routine win — a solid straight-sets victory over Antonia Ruzic — followed by yet another retirement, this time trailing Muchova 4-2. DR at 0.74, body evidently not interested in chasing a comeback.
For a season that had begun with the roar of an Australian Open semifinal, the autumn faded more like a long exhale than a surge.
Paula Badosa Assessment
On paper, Badosa’s 2025 reads as a solid, professional year for a Top-20 player:
- Australian Open semifinal, including a signature win over Coco Gauff.
- Dubai and Strasbourg runs with high-quality wins (Mertens, Navarro, Osaka).
- A return to the Top 20, ending the year around No.18.
But the way she got there matters. This wasn’t consolidation — she started at No.12. It wasn’t collapse either — she finished the year at No.18. It was a season in which her best tennis remained genuinely elite, while her availability and durability lagged behind.
The dominance ratios in her wins tell one story: when she was right, she really was. Gibson, Cristian, Lys, Danilovic, some of the AO and Berlin matches — these were beatdowns, not squeaks. Even in several losses (that Rybakina epic in Dubai, the Saville match in Merida before retirement), she was playing at a level that could have justified a higher ranking than the one she ended with.
The retirements and walkovers tell another story entirely. Merida, Miami, Berlin, Beijing — four tournaments where the scoreboard shows her tennis giving way to her body. That fragility, more than any tactical flaw, put a ceiling on her year.
In competitive terms, 2025 reasserted Badosa as a factor at the biggest events. In structural terms, it underlined the central question of this stage of her career: can she stay fit long enough to turn one Melbourne-style surge into a season-long presence near the top?
Final Verdict: B
A year that proved the level is still there but also that the margins are narrower than ever. Badosa played like a top-10 talent in bursts, defended like a top-20 pro for much of the season, and managed her body like someone still negotiating with fate.
GPA: 3.0
Not a comeback fairytale. Not a disappointment.
A hard, honest year in the middle marred by injuries — one that keeps her firmly on the map, and leaves 2026 with a simple, brutal task: fewer mid-match goodbyes, more second-week hellos.
Related WTA Articles You Might Enjoy
Paula Badosa’s Breakthrough: Triumphs Over Coco Gauff to Reach Australian Open Semifinals
Elena Rybakina Survives Six Match Points! to Edge Paula Badosa in Tactical Baseline Battle in Dubai